truthseeker

Me too! Just heard that Mr. McTrollerson was alleging that I'm Martin, and you, again. Yawn. Felt compelled to take a break from my boycott of any site that permits Rees' libel to restate that I am STILL not Martin. Or BFrank. Or Factchecker btw. It would thus appear that your supersecret "source" is another one of your ridiculous fabrications. And back I go, to the part of the universe that doesn't permit Rees' nonsense. Good luck, B. I don't know how you put up with him.

I guarantee that he won't go away quietly, or at all. He's psychologically incapable of that. However, I'm pleased to report that intelligence and ethics have prevailed in this particular political race. With 65% of the vote counted at 10:30 PM, a whopping 15 people - well below 1%- of voters had made the mistake of selecting Rees in this Ward 3 Primary. Compared to more than 3800 for Cheh.

Oh. My. God. I cannot believe he posted on a group about Chevy Chase THE ACTOR!!! That's a riot! I mean, seriously, what are the odds that a variety of totally unrelated individuals, who also happen to post on other local groups, ALL HAPPENED TO MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE? TOO funny! Glad I stopped in.

I should also like to point out that I haven't been posting ANYTHING on this website for quite some time. I'm not encouraging this jackass any longer, nor am I contributing to any website that encourages his behavior for its own financial gain. As you were.

(Oops! Sorry, B. We apparently posted thelinks at the same time. I guess these are all over town by now.) how interesting. Rees claimed on one of the DCWire threads that "some woman named Ida" who "moved to Marshall, TX" used to persecute him for his "pro-gay rights" (ha!) views. He further claimed that it was SHE who "fabricated" the profile. Lots of Idas. Lots of Texas. Lots of Rees.

http://www.stormpages.com/e/energylaw/. http://www.stormpages.com/i/idaruth/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ustreetnews/...40?viscount=100 http://profiles.yahoo.com/ebonyfiretx2002 deleting the page won't matter...screenshots in hand and distributed.

A thoroughgoing whackjob is a world away from a Rugged Individualist. I realize you imagine yourself to be the latter, but that's the disease talking I'm afraid.

Ah, Ward3lady, how fondly we remember you from your classic Craigslist forum spam. ;-) I have a screen shot of a post there featuring that very email address. Funny little coincidence, isn't it? Can't wait to hear the credulity-defying explanation. (*pulls up chair. leans forward*) I'm sure the moderators of several local blogs will find the IPs below of interest ;-) Violated Guidelines. This post will be placed in Spam folder. Member: Mr Rees Member Email: ward3lady@hotmail.com IP: 66.246.218.240 IP: 72.75.35.220 IP: 207.44.237.168 IP: 71.252.108.26 IP: 70.86.108.146 IP: 69.46.25.89

just wonderin'.

And that is, as the poet said, the very definition of The Fool.

Clearly.

Excellent.

Or the ward 3 election.

Wow. Golly. We must've been wrong about "Scooper." //sarcasm.

Late Breaking News: Google has been invented.

I'm sure it comforts you to think so.

I think you failed to understand the referent. "My posts" was part of the hypothetical construction "if I were Rees'". (And it gratifies me deeply that I am not.) Wow, Columbia University, eh? How you expect to comprehend the complexities of legislative language, let alone common discourse, is really beyond me.

Apparently, the Post and CityPaper are done with him, so he's back here in unmoderated land. He's only been posting for about a half hour and I'm already bored with the predictability of it all. new alias, same repetitive message. Ciao.

Nope. I would imagine you'd get tired of always being wrong, eventually. It's tragic, really.

Nope. I took screen shots of them all. Only the stuff posted by the obvious Rees aliases is gone. How did the Post figure it out, I wonder? ;-) If I were Rees, I'd be a little more circumspect about my posts there.

I'll try not to lose sleep over this.

Better you should ask what will we do when flying robots people the earth, which is the more likely scenario. Vague and childish handbills do not equal genuine campaigning. Advertising 101: "Reaching voters" isn't enough. "Advertising" isn't about sheer quantity. There's effective advertising, and ineffective advertising. Having a coherent, well-articulated message is paramount. But in the end having a good product is the most important thing of all. In this case, a rational, capable, trustworthy, humane, intelligent, experienced candidate who believes in doing what's right. Who doesn't condone seedy shadowy on-line libel, hate speech, disinformation and spam. No amount of "advertising" can make people want a defective product.

Oh, but see you're just plain wrong. My perspective is NOT native-born American, but native European. My academic background, if I may mention it, makes me quite capable, thanks, of offering an authoritative statement on this subject. What a hoot! You have no idea how foolish you sound, sir. None at all. Please go back to DCWire and CityPaper, where your inane posts can be moderated into oblivion.

Read it? We have it memorized! We quote it, for laughs, at parties!!