bfrankdc

Funny, you keep referring to the Lawyer at Hogan and Hartson, but clearly, that is Jonathan T Rees: http://www.hhlaw.com/jtrees/ Also, the links that truthseeker provided of the "Suzanne Jackson" impersonations are telling. Further, the posts from "jrrees1955" (which is "our" Jonathan Rees" claim residence in Ward one in the 1990's to early 2000's. Of course, there is also the Longview, Texas residency from 2002: http://www.stormpages.com/g/gourdine/ "When I first arrived in Washington, D.C., and began working in the legal industry, I got my start with a little help from Isaac Gourdine and Larry C. Williams who shared office space and through them, I grew through friends of their's in the legal community and went on to work as a paralegal in notable cases: E.G. United States of America v. Marion Barry, United States of America v. John Gotti, United States of America v. Daro Realty, Inc., and others and made a lot of friends and enemies alike. When I heard of the passing of Isaac Gourdine it was by accident as I was sitting here at my computer at my distant office in Longview, Texas, when I stumbled along a news article on Yahoo." When you do a web search for "Jonathan R Rees" and attorney, you only get results for our candidate. When doing a web search for "Jonathan R Rees" and Lyndon LaRouche, you get a big zilch. Oh, where are these fabrications coming from? So someone is not being straight forward. Are you claiming that the Jonathan Rees cited in that cases with Blanca Reyes is not the same Jonathan Rees that is running for Ward 3 City Council? Please do tell! B. Frank

I think you need a new Pacer system: https://www.fastcase.com/Yahoo/Start.aspx?C...iateConst=Yahoo 602 A.2d 1137 Jonathan R. REES, Appellant, v. Blanca L. REYES, Appellee, a/k/a Blanca L.Rees. No. 91-740. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued December 11, 1991. Decided February 14, 1992. Appeal from the Superior Court, Cheryl M. Long, J. Jonathan R. Rees, pro se. Suzanne H. Jackson, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, FARRELL, Associate Judge, and KERN, Senior Judge. KERN, Senior Judge: Appellee-mother in February, 1991, filed in the Arlington, Virginia court a petition for custody of the parties' child.1 Appellee was then living in Virginia, but had formerly resided in the District of Columbia with appellant-father. On March 14th, the Virginia court granted appellee temporary custody of the child. The Virginia court acknowledged, as the trial court here noted in its order now on appeal, that the issue of its ultimate jurisdiction was to be litigated. Thereafter, appellant-father filed on March 20th in the trial court here a motion for temporary custody, as well as a complaint for (1) annulment of the parties' marriage and (2) award of the permanent custody of the child. Appellee responded with a Motion to Dismiss, asserting that Virginia was the appropriate and convenient forum in which to litigate the issue of custody and that the interest of the child would best be served by proceeding in Virginia. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing in May, heard argument on June 11th, and on June 28th, 1991, issued its order, which was accompanied by extensive findings of facts and conclusions of law. The trial court denied appellant's motion for temporary custody, certified his annulment action to the trial court's Family Division, and dismissed the custody action on the ground that the Virginia court was the more appropriate forum for the determination of custody. Appellant does not contend (and, indeed, has provided no record for this court to consider such contention) that the court's findings lack support in the evidence. Rather, appellant's contention seems to be that the trial court's decision that the Arlington, Virginia court was the appropriate forum for custody determination under the particular circumstances runs afoul of the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act of 1980 ("PKPA") (28 U.S.C. § 1738A (1991 Repl.))2 and constitutes a precedent that thwarts the Congressional intent in enacting this particular legislation. We affirm. The trial court determined in its findings of facts pursuant to the evidentiary hearing that on January 28, 1991, appellee-mother left the marital abode in the District of Columbia because of marital difficulties and, with her two children, moved to and established residence in Arlington, Virginia. The court pointed out in its conclusions that the Virginia court, in granting temporary custody of the parties' child to appellee-mother, was acting pursuant to a mandate from the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act ("UCCJA"),3 consistent with the PKPA,4 by exercising its emergency jurisdiction to make a temporary custody determination.

Gee, "Lucifer" sure sounds a lot like Rees and the aliases. Of course, just about every allegation has already been disproven by Mr. Austermuhle, but since when does Rees care about facts? B. Frank (and you wonder why I am not using my full name when posting here)

Actually, you can see from my profile that I registered here in November. Can't you get any facts straight? I never even knew of you much before that. B. Frank

Given the actions of the political candidate, when contacting employers, media, etc. for those that challenge him, I do not blame anyone for using names that mask full identity. That said, my name is what it is and has been consistent since the day I regsitered in this forum. But hey, thanks "Lucifer". I am also glad you have clarified your reasons for the incessant anonymous postings. That doesn't explain the wacky on-line behavior you have engaged in with your real name. B. Frank

At least we all know where Lucifer resides.

So I take that as "No, I cannot provide any links regarding potentially false allegations you <bfrank> have made". B. Frank

What unsubstantiated allegations have I posted? Provide links to allegations, and I will be happy to post links or screen shots to verify any claim I have made (where this hasn't already been done). I have asked this of you before, and like the other times, I will expect no response. B. Frank

No, I am using online sources to back up the truth. You on the otherhand are simply posting whatever you wish with reckless abandon, only to be undone by facts. Can't let facts get in the way of truth, afterall. Let's see, there is no "Jim Corley" in the AU database, there is no "School of Public Administration" at American University, and there is no such school contained within the Kogod School of Business. These are all claims you have made which are patently false. B. Frank

Why do you continually bring up Brooks? What lies have I posted? Please provide links or references of any lies I have made? As it is, I have uncovered some pretty big ones from "Lucifer" Who is next? B. Frank

I will make this easier for you Rees... There is a school of Public Affiars, and within it, there is a Department of Public Administration. However, any undergrad or grad student worth their weight, would refer to it as such. http://spa.american.edu/department.php?dept=dpa You don't show up in the student database, and you are not using the terminology in a way consistent with a real member of the community. I hope you will research the background of your next alias a little better. B. Frank

So you are finally admitting you are Rees. I thought I was being repelled by "Gay Republican", "Lucifer", "Tammy Bresloff", "Nikkidix", "The Grim Reaper", "DC DEEP THROAT", "Sleazy Sam" and the rest of the Rees gang. Admission is the first step to recovery. B. Frank

And nowhere withing the Kogod School of Business is there a core, or course offering entitled "Public Administration". Within the Core areas of study are: ACCT-240 - Principles of Financial Accounting (3) ACCT-241 - Principles of Managerial Accounting (3) FIN-365 - Business Finance (3) ITEC-350 - Introduction to Management Information Systems (3) ITEC-355 - Production/Operations Management (3) IBUS-300 - Fundamentals of International Business (3) MGMT-100 - Business 1.0 (3) MGMT-201 - Global Corporate Citizenship (3) MGMT-353 - Principles of Organizational Theory, Behavior and Management (3) MGMT-458 - Business Policy and Strategy (3) MKTG-300 - Principles of Marketing (3) Withing the areas of specialization are: Accounting Double Major Finance Information Systems and Technology (IST) International Business International Finance International Management International Marketing Management Marketing Real Estate Here are the undergraduate minors: Business Administration (General Business) Finance Information Systems and Technology Marketing Real Estate So, where was that "School of Public Administration? LOL B. Frank

This coming from the phantom AU Student Jim Corley, who doesn't appear in the AU database, who doesn't know what building he is in, or what his major area of study is and who goes by "lucifer". Nice.

Where? http://kogod.american.edu/ArtPage.cfm?Item...6&AudienceID=12 Try again. B. Frank

Then you are trespassing School property. By the way, at AU, it is either the "School of Public Affairs" or the "School of International Service". There is no "school of Public Administration". That would be at GWU. B. Frank

I am neither the one who claimed to be an AU Student, nor am I the political candidate. You claimed to be "finishing up at AU". I didn't see your "name" in the database of enrolled students. B. Frank

Glad to see you are admitting you lied about being an AU student, just like you lied about being a Columbia and NYU Graduate. Where are my lies? I have documented yours. B. Frank

You weren't even aware that there was an online way for faculty, staff and others associated with the University to check. LOL B. Frank

No fowl, just access to the database (if you were a real member of the AU Community, you would know that access point, and who is available to login into it. Nice try. I can't wait to see what the next persona will be. B. Frank

Then why don't you show up when I perform a search using my login? http://domino.american.edu/AU/OIT/Web/sear...ts?OpenFrameset

Out of curiousity, why wouldn't Mr. Rees post this himself? Where are the email headers that would normally show that there was actually an email from Mr. Rees? What you have posted is a supposed email from Corley to Rees. It should have been the other way around, where the email headers should have been from Mr. Rees, coming back to "Jim Corley". Why is it that when you do a web search for "lucifer20016@hotmail.com" there are no hits? Why is it that when you do a search for "Jim Corley" there aren't any that show any connection to Washington, DC or any of the other places where there is a connection to Mr. Rees? You did a better job when you misspelled Martin Austermuhle's name in the forged email with him. It all raises more questions. B. Frank

zzzzzzzz

No, it sounds like, "ya right" given that your premise is wrong. It's not like it isn't 60 and sunny out, with NCAA hoops on, as well as opening day of the Cherry Blossom Festival.