
bfrankdc
Senator-
Posts
569 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by bfrankdc
-
REES' OLDER BROTHERS JIM & JACK
bfrankdc replied to The Real Truthseeker's topic in District of Columbia Politics
That's funny because you claimed that Max was Rees's only brother, and was the one I saw taping flyers to utlity poles. So now we can add this to the wife, children, job and education lies. B. Frank -
ERIK GAULL'S CAMPAIGN POSTER
bfrankdc replied to The Real Truthseeker's topic in District of Columbia Politics
-
BFRANK & TRUTHSEEKER AT THEIR NIGHT JOBS
bfrankdc replied to The Real Truthseeker's topic in District of Columbia Politics
That was one of the greatest TV shows ever. -
FACTCHECKER KNOWN SPOUSAL ABUSER
bfrankdc replied to The Real Truthseeker's topic in District of Columbia Politics
-
TEAM REES BEATS UP A VANDUAL
bfrankdc replied to The Real Truthseeker's topic in District of Columbia Politics
-
STEIN DEMOCRATS KICKED SAM BROOKS OUT
bfrankdc replied to The Real Truthseeker's topic in District of Columbia Politics
I know for a fact that Craig Newmark is truly excited that you continue to ignore his ban on your posts. Have you ever noticed that they are generally deleted within 48 hours of being posted? B. Frank -
So here is more (so much for the PACER system that 'Sam Brooks Watcher' uses, or the references and denials about Rees's litigation history (I am sure there are more, but here is a list compiled thus far): 1:90-cv-01360-SS REES v. DARO REALTY, INC. filed 06/11/90 closed 06/14/90 1:90-cv-02150-NHJ REES v. DARO REALTY, INC., et al filed 08/31/90 closed 01/24/91 1:91-cv-00334-NHJ REES v. DARO REALTY, INC., et al filed 02/14/91 closed 03/22/91 1:91-cv-01843-SS REES v. REYES filed 07/25/91 closed 08/06/91 1:91-cv-03287-HHG REES v. ARLINGTON CTY. JUVEN, et al filed 12/24/91 closed 03/04/92 1:94-cv-01364-RCL REES v. URBINA, et al filed 06/20/94 closed 07/27/94 1:96-cv-01238-GK PEARSON, et al v. KOLP, et al filed 06/04/96 closed 02/28/97 1:97-cv-02853-PLF REES v. KOLP filed 11/28/97 closed 01/30/98 1:88-cv-03515-RCL REES v. GRAHAM PHOTO SUPPLY filed 12/09/88 closed 02/28/89 1:89-cv-02095-GHR REES v. GRAY filed 07/26/89 closed 11/09/89 1:89-cv-02203-GHR REES v. CHON filed 08/03/89 closed 12/01/89 1:89-cv-03217-GHR REES v. FAMILY ACT. CENTER filed 11/30/89 closed 12/14/89 1:91-cv-01882-SS REES v. RUBLE, et al filed 07/30/91 closed 09/06/91 1:92-cv-00495-HHG REES v. LONG, et al filed 02/28/92 closed 03/17/92 1:92-cv-00619-TPJ REES, et al v. REYES, et al filed 03/10/92 closed 07/30/92 3:92-cv-02198-CC Rees v. Barr, et al filed 08/26/92 closed 09/23/92 3:92-cv-02500-GG Rees v. Urbina filed 10/23/92 closed 11/17/92 3:94-cv-01555-JAF Rees v. Urbina, et al filed 04/25/94 closed 05/27/94 3:94-cv-01569-PG Rees v. Ferrari, et al filed 04/26/94 closed 06/09/94 3:94-cv-02169-PG U.S.A. v. Lugo-Ramirez, et al filed 08/30/94 closed 08/09/95 And he wonders why people are scared of him. It ain't because of his political acumen, but rather his ability and desire to gain the attention of litigants in the court system (note how Rees is never the defendant but the aggressor, in some cases on a Pro Se (do-it-yourself) basis. Note also that many of these cases were dismissed in days or weeks, in part to the lack of merit of the Plaintiff) B. Frank
-
Rees, How many places to you post the "Rees & USA v Daro" information? Do you not understand that there is no such case? There is a Rees v Daro which is a Job Discrimination suit There is a US v Daro which is a Housing Discrimination suit. According to some nice sluething by someone at the City Paper blog, there is a website you made, where in your own words you claim to be a paralegal for the US v Daro case. No amount of backpeddling, etc. can dispute your lies. You lied about how many children you have (was it 0, 2, 3 or 3 and a foster child?) You lied about your marraiges (was it not married, twice married, once to Ms. Cisneros and once to Ms. Silverman, or OOOPs, there is a Blanca Reyes.) Indeed, according to the record, Ms. Reyes is the mother of your children, not Ms. Cisneros as you have claimed in posts here and at DCist. You lied about your employment history. You lied about your educational background. You have been banned from every internet forum that matters including this one several times (despite your registering again under yet ANOTHER alias. You have no more credibility. B. Frank
-
REES BLOG IS HALARIOUS
bfrankdc replied to Sam Brooks Watch's topic in District of Columbia Politics
What is hilarious is that blogspot.com finally came to its senses and banned the vitrol coming from Rees's keyboard. B. Frank -
Rees Responds To Aglue
bfrankdc replied to Sam Brooks Watch's topic in District of Columbia Politics
Hands on DC is an annual city wide event where groups (such as Alumni Clubs, local independant schools, office workers) form teams to go into selected DC public schools, and perform clean-ups, landscaping, painting walls, etc. It is a great way to spend a usually nice weekend afternoon, and a concrete way of helping the DCPS. Granted, it is a drop in the bucket for what the schools need, but for people who are otherwise not normally connected to the city, it is a great way to help foster ties in the community. Here is their website: http://www.handsondc.org/ -
Rees Responds To Aglue
bfrankdc replied to Sam Brooks Watch's topic in District of Columbia Politics
Luke, You have no idea who I am or what kind of volunteer time I give to my community. Suffice it to say it is significant, whether in local associations and political activism, in soup kitchens, environmental clean-ups or things like "Hands on DC". That said, I agree there are important issues that we face in our neighborhoods, in our Ward, in our city and our region. The political campaign is an opportunity for the citizens of each local jurisdiction to choose the leaders to confront these issues. Message boards and blogs like DC Pages is but one outlet for political candidates to address issues, absorb public sentiment and otherwise conduct a campaign. The problem is that the one political candidate who has chosen to post in this forum has yet to present any substance on the "issues". Rather, this candidate has made his personal issues (his family, his professional life, his educational background, and his children) and allegations he makes about his opponents "the issue". These posts, dating back to the November when I started posting have been rife with half-truths, lies, innuendo, etc. that when researched, prove to be mostly false, and generally based on his own heresay. It is also obvious, based on the trail left at Yahoo Listserve's since the summer and back in 2001, that the MO of this candidate has not wavered. The record is clear (as I have posted in the 'multiple alias' threads) that the IP addresses for this candidate are consistent from the Summer of 2005 to the late fall, when he discovered the proxy IP process. Even then, the groupings of IP addresses through the proxy servers are consistent. This person has clearly violated numerous TOS obligations as truthseeker has noted. You have the tools to research the IP addresses of everyone who has posted here, and see the common threads, based on user ID, IP address and ISP. It is fairly conclusive. As board moderator, if you want serious discussion, it requires work to keep valid posters active and in-line, and further to keep the multiple alias, TOS violating posters off the boards. It's just my two cents, but if you want that kind of behavior on these boards, you have to be a more active moderator, or else let other people help in that regard. As factchecker2 noted, when lies are being spread, they should be challenged. Perhaps an examination of the origin of the lies would help? Otherwise, you are left with what the last 10 pages of posts from the fall and winter have yielded. B. Frank -
Rees Responds To Aglue
bfrankdc replied to Sam Brooks Watch's topic in District of Columbia Politics
Luke, How many times do you, as owner and moderator of this forum, have to ask the SAME person to behave in accordance with your posted rules before they are summarily banned all together? B. Frank -
REES BLOG IS HALARIOUS
bfrankdc replied to Sam Brooks Watch's topic in District of Columbia Politics
Is that 'we' as in "me, myself and I"? Please. The time stamps on "Sam Brooks Watch" posts last night/this morning match the time stamps on the updates to the jrrees.blogspot.com website. B. Frank -
REES BLOG IS HALARIOUS
bfrankdc replied to Sam Brooks Watch's topic in District of Columbia Politics
War? What war? If no one cares, why do you bother to post here and in other forums? Why do you bother with your blogs? B. Frank -
REES BLOG IS HALARIOUS
bfrankdc replied to Sam Brooks Watch's topic in District of Columbia Politics
Yes, this Rees guy is "funny", but probably not the way you meant it. B. Frank -
Thanks for the blueprint as to how you are doing this, Mr. Rees. I also appreciate the education you gave the members of this forum on proxy IP services. B. Frank
-
ALIAS NAMES ARE USED TO PROTECT LIARS
bfrankdc replied to Sam Brooks Watch's topic in District of Columbia Politics
-
I think it is more of a self reflective reasoning WHY HE posts anonymously. B. Frank
-
For an extended period, I had such priveleges and posted the results in a thread entitled "Multiple Alias Disorder". Luke Wilbur (DC Pages Owner and Moderator) can confirm the results, if he wishes to. You will find several instances where a Rees alias has been banned by Mr. Wilbur, with the noted IP address. In each case, the IP address has been consistent with other IP addresses Mr. Rees uses either from his work, or his home. These IP addresses can be confirmed further with the second "Multiple Alias Disorder" thread I posted which links to the headers within many Rees/Alias postings at Yahoo. The moderater will further find that the posters in question (me, factchecker2, truthseeker, golder girl, etc.) are different people with different IP addresses. In the case of factchecker2 and truthseeker, the IP addresses have been the same for the extant of their posting in this forum. Mine are always within the same ISP, except for when I am on the road, such as today. I do not recall Goldern Girl's IP source. For what it is worth, Mr. Rees and his aliases (in the pre proxy IP period) posted either from a level three 4.249.x.x IP or else a Verizon broadband IP address (the latter probably from work). However in the "post proxy IP period, the IP trail, while different, was always consistent within itself. Also, you will note that when using a proxy IP server, there are errors in the code which manifest itself as slashes (/////) where there are quotes or apostrophes. More recently, Mr. Rees has also utilized an Mindspring/Earthlink account (207.69.x.x) ISP as noted in the banning of "DC DEEP THROAT" an posts to Yahoo Groups as well as emails to his fellow candidates and the media. B. Frank
-
I am glad you are finally admitting the Multiple Alias Disorder. The IP logs don't lie. It will be good if you don't too. This is a great first step. B. Frank
-
Truthseeker is right. Check the headers of any of Rees's emails (he sends things to journalists and others all the time). The Originating IP is usually 4.249.X.X, (level 3), 66.94.237.x (Yahoo), or 207.169.137.X (Earthlink/Mindspring). I might add, that this is the same ISP (level 3) as used by: Jonathan Rees jrrees2006 Jason Rees S. Jackson Angela Biddy Lester Graham NikkiDix NikDix Mindy Hector Cruz Mindy Silverman Cindy Jenkins Linda Spector Margie Clay "Guest_Alex" Juan Antonio Sanchez Gabriella Rees Joanne Kaufman Josh Lambert "Kathy Patterson" James Ray Smith missgloverpark Tammy Bresloff Roy Stewart/pizzapimp11 Ramon Rivera/Stewart20008 Andrew Dice Clay (adc2006) Pam/pj20007 lg_loomis Brooks2006 Sam_Brooks Thelma Cumes (dc_cumes) MPD Officer Jose Magana Isn't it so coincidental that all of the above aliases come from the same Internet Service Provider, type in the same colloquialisms, and all support Jonathan Rees? (And these are just at DC Pages. There are other aliases at Craigslist, DCist, DCDL.org, etc.) You can check Luke Wilbur's banning messages to see what the IP address of some of the more vile posters (DC_DEEP_THROAT, eg) have been. B. Frank
-
Voters care if a candidate is out of touch with reality. B. Frank (By the way, since when is a politican supposed to bend to the will of the majority? If that were the case, SE Washington would look the same in 5 years that it does today. Last I heard, there will be a new baseball stadium on South Capitol Street)
-
If it is a different "Jonathan R Rees" then what is your concern? So, you had personal information on your website. It has been deleted. So, you had professional information on your website. It has been deleted. So, you had educational background information on your website. It has been deleted. They were all deleted after folks discovered that your version of your life didn't quite measure up to reality. Now all you have left is to make up things about your opponents. Good luck with that. B. Frank PS...there doesn't appear top BE another "Jonathan R Rees".