eninn

لماذا نعبد الله ونمجده وهو لا يحتاج لذلك؟ د ذاكر نايك Dr Zakir Naik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pdITBKqhs4 Ask the Sheikh" by Musa cerantonio ( Not Being Isolating ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpQkyih3fBA

Moses was probably born during the reign of Ramesses II. Biblical data. are therefore of considerable historical value in the story of Moses. A medical study of the mummy of Merneptah has yielded further useful information on the possible causes of this pharaoh’s death. The fact that we possess the mummy of this pharaoh is one of paramount importance. The Bible records that pharaoh was engulfed in the sea, but does not give any details as to what subsequently became of his corpse. The Qur’an, in chapter Yoonus, notes that the body of the pharaoh would be saved from the waters: “Today I will save your dead body so that you may be a sign for those who come after you.” Qur’an, 10:92 A medical examination of this mummy, has, shown that the body could not have stayed in the water for long, because it does not show signs of deterioration due to prolonged submersion. Here again, the comparison between the narration in the Qur’an and the data provided by modern knowledge does not give rise to the slightest objection from a scientific point of view. Such points of agreement are characteristic of the Qur’anic revelation. But, are we throwing the Judeo-Christian revelation into discredit and depriving it of all its intrinsic value by stressing the faults as seen from a scientific point of view? I think not because the criticism is not aimed at the text as a whole, but only at certain passages. There are parts of the Bible which have an undoubted historical value. I have shown that in my book, The Bible, The Qur’an and Science, where I discuss passages which enable us to locate Moses in time. The main causes which brought about such differences as arise from the comparison between the Holy Scriptures and modern knowledge is known to modern scholars. The Old Testament constitutes a collection of literary works produced in the course of roughly nine centuries and which has undergone many alterations. The part played by men in the actual composition of the texts of the Bible is quite considerable. The Qur’anic revelation, on the other hand, has a history which is radically different. As we have already seen, from the moment it was first commto humans, it was learnt by heart and written down during Muhammad’s own lifetime. It is thanks to this fact that the Qur’an does not pose any problem of authenticity. A totally objective examination of the Qur’an, in the light of modern knowledge, leads us to recognize the agreement between the two, as has already been noted on repeated occasions throughout this presentation. It makes us deem it quite unthinkable for a man of Muhammad’s time to have been the author of such statements, on account of the state of knowledge in his day. Such considerations are part of what gives the Qur’anic revelation its unique place among religious and non-religious texts, and forces the impartial scientist to admit his inability to provide an explanation based solely upon materialistic reasoning. Such facts as I have had the pleasure of exposing to you here, appear to represent a genuine challenge to human explanation leaving only one alternative: the Qur’an is undoubtedly a revelation from God. Scientific Miracles Of The Holy Quran - Preservation of pharaoh's body in the time of Moses https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbggjYExIYE Musa (AS) and Firaun (Moses and Pharoah) - Nouman Ali Khan (Full Lecture) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgwdeGPAMx4

comparison between the Bible and the Qur’an; descriptions of the deluge. In actual fact, the Biblical narration is a fusion of two descriptions in which events are related differently. The Bible speaks of a universal flood and places it roughly 300 years before Abraham. According to what we know of Abraham, this would imply a universal cataclysm around the twenty-first or twenty-second century BC This story would be untenable, in view of presently available historical data. How can we accept the idea that, in the twenty-first or twenty-second century BC, all civilization was wiped off the face of the earth by a universal cataclysm, when we know that this period corresponds, for example, to the one preceding the Middle Kingdom in Egypt, at roughly the date of the first Intermediary period before the eleventh dynasty? It is historically unacceptable to maintain that, at this time, humanity was totally wiped out. None of the preceding statements is acceptable according to modern knowledge. From this point of view, we can measure the enormous gap separating the Bible from the Qur’an. In contrast to the Bible, the narration contained in the Qur’an deals with a cataclysm that is limited to Noah’s people. They were punished for their sins, as were other ungodly peoples. The Qur’an does not fix the cataclysm in time. There are absolutely no historical or archaeological objections to the narration in the Qur’an. Quran correct Bible Noahs Flood https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CU_VJXrY4PY Noah's Ark in the bible and the quran https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ea3B7PHvFU

comparison between modern knowledge and passages in the Qur’an that are also referred to in the Bible. Creation We have already come across some of the contradictions between scripture and science regarding the creation of the universe. When dealing with that topic, I stressed the perfect agreement between modern knowledge and verses in the Qur’an, and pointed out that the Biblical narration contained statements that were scientifically unacceptable. This is hardly surprising if we are aware that the narration of the creation contained in the Bible was the work of priests living in the sixth century BC, hence the term ‘sacerdotal’ ( priestly ) narration is officially used to refer to it. The narration seems to have been conceived as the theme of a sermon designed to exhort people to observe the Sabbath. The narration was constructed with a definite end in view, and as Father de Vaux (a former head of the Biblical School of Jerusalem) has noted, this end was essentially legalist in character. The Bible also contains a much shorter and older narration of Creation, the so-called ‘Yahvist’ version, which approaches the subject from a completely different angle. They are both taken from Genesis, the first book of the Pentateuch or Torah. Moses is supposed to have been its author, but the text we have today has undergone many changes. The sacerdotal narration of Genesis is famous for its whimsical genealogies, that go back to Adam, and which nobody takes very seriously. Nevertheless, such Gospel authors as Matthew and Luke have reproduced them, more or less word-for-word, in their genealogies of Jesus. Matthew goes back as far as Abraham, and Luke to Adam. These writings are scientifically unacceptable, because they set a date for the age of the world and the time humans appeared on Earth, which most definitely contradicts what modern science has firmly established. The Qur’an, on the other hand, is completely free of dates of this kind. Earlier on, we noted how perfectly the Qur’an agrees with modern ideas on the formation of the Universe. On the other hand, the Biblical narration of primordial waters is hardly, nor is the creation of light on the first day before the creation of the stars which produce this light; the existence of an evening and a morning before the creation of the earth; the creation of the earth on the third day before that of the sun on the fourth; the appearance of beasts of the earth on the sixth day after the appearance of the birds of the air on the fifth day, although the former came first. All these statements are the result of beliefs prevalent at the time this text was written and do not have any other meaning. Qur'an & Bible In The Light of Science - The Ultimate Dialogue https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eezncqgZJrY احمد ديدات محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم العظيم.wmv http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SO86cs3ZXU

الإسلام والديمقراطية للداعية عبد الرحيم جرين - مترجم - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Frvjuaea22w "Ask the Sheikh" by Musa cerantonio ( Happiness In Islam ) ... ‪ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fXMmq9mGmw

Once the egg has been fertilized in the fallopian tube, it descends to lodge itself inside the uterus. This process is called the ‘implantation of the egg’. Implantation is a result of the development of villosities, which, like roots in the soil, draw nourishment from the wall of the uterus and make the egg literally cling to the womb. The process of implantation is appropriately described in several verses by the word ‘alaq, which is also the title of the chapter in which one of the verses appears: “God fashioned humans from a clinging entity.” Qur’an, 96:2 The evolution of the embryo inside the maternal uterus is only briefly described, but the description is accurate, because the simple words referring to it correspond exactly to fundamental stages in its growth. This is what we read in a verse from the chapter al-Mu’minoon: “I fashioned the clinging entity into a chewed lump of flesh and I fashioned the chewed flesh into bones and I clothed the bones with intact flesh.” Qur’an, 23:14 The term ‘chewed flesh’ (mudghah) corresponds exactly to the appearance of the embryo at a certain stage in its development. It is known that the bones develop inside this mass and that they are then covered with muscle. This is the meaning of the term ‘intact flesh’ (lahm). The embryo passes through a stage where some parts are in proportion and others out of proportion with what is later to become the individual. This is the obvious meaning of a verse in the chapter al-Hajj, which reads as follows: “I fashioned (humans) a clinging entity, then into a lump of flesh in proportion and out of proportion.” Qur’an, 22:5. Next, we have a reference to the appearance of the senses and internal organs in the chapter as-Sajdah: “… and (God) gave you ears, eyes and hearts.” Qur’an, 32:9 Nothing here contradicts today’s data and, furthermore, none of the mistaken ideas of the time have crept into the Qur’an. Throughout the Middle Ages there were a variety of beliefs about human development based on myths and speculations which continued for several centuries after the period. The most fundamental stage in the history of embryology came in 1651 with Harvey’s statement that “all life initially comes from an egg”. At that time, when science had benefited greatly from the invention of the microscope, people were still arguing about the respective roles of the egg and spermatozoon. Buffon, the great naturalist, was one of those in favor of the egg theory.Bonnet, on the other hand, supported the theory of ‘the ovaries of Eve’, which stated that Eve, the mother of the human race, was-supposed to have had inside her the seeds of all human beings packed together one inside the other. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsD2Dnbd4ps Embryology in Quran الشيخ ديدات الأب والأبن والأم والروح القدس youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_UZ_pa2n94

the complexity of the semen and the fact that an infinitely small quantity is required to ensure fertilization. In chapter al-Insaan the Qur’an states: “Verily, I created humankind from a small quantity of mingled fluids.” Qur’an, 76:2 The Arabic word nutfah has been translated as “small quantity”. It comes from the verb meaning ‘to dribble, to trickle’ and is used to describe what remains in the bottom of a bucket which has been emptied. The verse correctly implies that fertilization is performed by only a very small volume of liquid. On the other hand, mingled fluids ( amshaaj ) has been understood by early commentators to refer to the mixture of male and female discharges. Modern authors have corrected this view and note that the sperm is made up of various components. When the Qur’an talks of a fertilizing fluid composed of different components, it also informs us that human progeny will be formed from something extracted from this liquid. This is the meaning of the following verse in chapter as-Sajdah: “Then He made [ man's ] offspring from the essence of a despised fluid.” Qur’an, 32:8 The Arabic word translated by the term ‘essence’ is sulaalah which means ‘something extracted, the best part of a thing’. In whatever way it is translated, it refers to part of a whole. Under normal conditions, only one single cell, spermatozoon, out of over 50 million ejaculated by a man during sexual intercourse will actually penetrate the ovule. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfTzVbdu2eU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pnc4woJSfk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMQPkDKnOCM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eghBcXYddk An Atheist presented contradictions in Quran- Abdur Raheem Green worth watching - 2014 Dr Zakir Naik - Creation of Men- from sperm or dust - Does Quran contradicts? Re: The Miraculous Quran: Embryology and Semen (1 of 2) Re: The Miraculous Quran: Embryology and Semen (2 of 2)

botany at the time of Muhammad (S) was not advanced enough in any country for scientists to know that plants have both male and female parts. but in the Qur’an “(God is the One who) sent down rain from the sky and with it brought forth a variety of plants in pairs.” Qur’an, 20:53 Today we know that fruit comes from plants that have sexual characteristics even when they come from unfertilized flowers, like bananas. In the chapter ar-Ra‘d we read the following: “… and of all fruits (God) placed (on the earth) two pairs.” Qur’an, 13:3 In the field of physiology, there is one verse which appears extremely significant to me. One thousand years before the discovery of the blood circulatory system, and roughly thirteen centuries before it was determined that the internal organs were nourished by the process of digestive , a verse in the Qur’an described the source of the constituents of milk, in conformity with scientific facts. To understand this verse, it must first be known that chemical reactions occur between food and enzymes in the mouth, the stomach and the intestines releasing nutrients in molecular form which are then absorbed into the circulatory system through countless microscopic projections of the intestinal wall called villi. Blood in the circulatory system then transports the nutrients to all the organs of the body, among which are the milk-producing mammary glands. This biological process must be basically understood, if we are to understand a verse in the Qur’an which has for many centuries given rise to commentaries that were totally incomprehensible. Today it is not difficult to see why! This verse is taken from the chapter an-Nahl: “Verily, in cattle there is a lesson for yon. I give you drink from their insides, coming from a conjunction between the digested contents ( of the intestines ) and the blood, milk pure and pleasant for those who drink it.” Qur’an, 16:66 The constituents of milk are secreted by the mammary glands which are nourished by the product of food digestion brought to them by the bloodstream. The initial event which sets the whole process in motion is the conjunction of the contents of the intestine and blood at the level of the intestinal wall itself. This very precise concept is the result of the discoveries made in the chemistry and physiology of the digestive system over one thousand years after the time of Prophet Muhammad (S). Plant and fruit reproduction in The Quran https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_Uy6lzQb7U Miracle of the Holy Quran for blood circulation and milk production Lecturer Zakir Naik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NzXVXSvqhw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtA4HXfcIXA

داعية أسترالي يقول كلام خطير جدا - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQr5MHpi4gc Tawheed al Haakimiyyah Ustaadh Musa Cerantonio - ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IjFnHQdvCM القصة التي يجب على كل مسلم أن يعرفها - فتح الأندلس https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcy9OGkvxbg الحضارة الإسلامية فى الأندلس Islamic civilization in Andalus ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63m8Y_lte_4

the water cycle in nature. This is a topic which is well known today. Consequently, the verses in the Qur’an that refer to the water cycle seem to express ideas that are now totally self-evident. But if we consider the ideas prevalent at that time, they appear to be based more on myth and philosophical speculation than on observed fact, even though useful practical knowledge on soil irrigation was current at that period. Let us examine, for example, the following verse in chapter az-Zumar: “Have you not seen that Allah sent rain down from the sky and caused it to penetrate the ground and come forth as springs, then He caused crops of different colors to grow…” Qur’an,39:21 Such notions seem quite natural to us today, but we should not forget that, not so long ago, they were not prevalent. It was not until the sixteenth century, with Bernard Palissy, that we gained the first coherent description of the water cycle. Prior to this, people believed that the waters of the oceans, under the effect of winds, were thrust towards the interior of the continents. They then returned to the oceans via the great abyss, which, since Plato’s time was called the Tartarus .In the seventeenth century, great thinkers such as Descartes still believed in this myth. Even in the nineteenth century there were still those who believed in Aristotle’s theory that water was condensed in cool mountain caverns and formed underground lakes that fed springs. Today, we know that it is the infiltration of rain water into the ground that is responsible for this. If one compares the facts of modern hydrology with the data found in numerous verses of the Qur’an on this subject, one cannot fail to notice the remarkable degree of agreement between the two. The Water Cycle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StPobH5ODTw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJXk6eG6Y-A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiLBGHwX_4c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fluiDCYCVhw Zakir Naik on Islamic Science-Water Cycle in Quran 8 - Scientific Facts in the Quran (Part 1) - The Proof That Islam Is The Truth - Abdur-Raheem Green 9 - Scientific Facts in the Quran (Part 2) - The Proof That Islam Is The Truth - Abdur-Raheem Green

Among the achievements of modern science is the “conquest” of space which has resulted in mans journey to the moon. The prediction of this event surely springs to mind when we read the chapter ar-Rahmaan in the Qur’an: “O assembly of Jinns and men, if you can penetrate the regions of the heavens and the earth, then penetrate them! You will not penetrate them except with authority.” Qur’an,55:33 Authority to travel in space can only come from the Creator of the laws which govern movement and space. The whole of this Qur’anic chapter invites humankind to recognize God’s beneficence. At this point, we must ask ourselves the following question: How could an uneducated man in the middle of the desert accurately tackle so many and such varied subjects at a time when mythology and superstition reigned supreme? How could he so skillfully avoid every belief that was proven to be totally inaccurate many centuries later? THE SEAL OF ALL THE PROPHETS MUHAMMAD PBUH - Muhammad Abdul Jabbar | ALQADRMEDIA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blxHYZfX78k ما رأي الاسلام في من لا دين له ؟ ذاكر نايك Zakir Naik - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHqITjlJfQY خطييييييير ذاكر نايك يتحدث عن الاضرحة - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msE4-c7TusM

The notion of a settled place for the sun is vividly described in chapter Yaa Seen of the Qur’an: “The sun runs its coarse to a settled place That is the decree of the Almighty, the All Knowing.” Qur’an, 36:38 “Settled place” is the translation of the word mustaqarr which indicates an exact appointed place and time. Modern astronomy confirms that the solar system is indeed moving in space at a rate of 12 miles per second towards a point situated in the constellation of Hercules ( alpha lyrae ) whose exact location has been precisely calculated. Astronomers have even give it a name, the solar apex. "the Quran miracles" The Sun & its brightness(1/3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=po65ViMfwTE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqw91ihJcQw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4SiHSCemT8

احمد ديدات كيف تقلب الطاولة على المبشرين – YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CnCJndgZ3U احمد ديدات الأختيار بين المسيحية و الإسلام - The Choice – Yo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WRQUyrN0pk أحمد ديدات - الإسلام والمسيحية - باكستان - مترجم - YouTube ‫ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzSe4XOsyPc

The Qur’anic description of the sequence of day and night would, in itself, be rather commonplace were it not for the fact that it is expressed in terms that are today highly appropriate. The Qur’an uses the verb kawwara in chapter az-Zumar to describe the way the night ‘winds’ or ‘coils’ itself around the day and the day around the night. “He coils the night upon the day and the day upon the night.” Qur’an, 39:5 The original meaning of the verb kis to coil a turban around the head. This is a totally valid comparison; yet at the time the Qur’an was revealed, the astronomical data necessary to make this comparison were unknown. It is not until man landed on the moon and observed the earth spinning on its axis, that the dark half of the globe appeared to wind itself around the light and the light half appeared to wind itself around the dark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFoGX49QzLg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_1TM-Y2lUA

Whereas the Bible talks of the sun and the moon as two lights differing only in size, the Qur’an distinguishes between them by the use of different terms: light (noor) for the moon, and lamp (siraaj) for the sun. “Did you see how Allah created seven heavens, one above the other, and made in them the moon a light and the sun a lamp?” Qur’an, 78:12-13 The moon is an inert body which reflects light, whereas the sun is a celestial body in a state of permanent combustion producing both light and heat. Stars and Planets The word ‘star’ (najm) in the Qur’an ( 86:3 ) is accompanied by the adjective thaaqib which indicates that it burns and consumes itself as it pierces through the shadows of the night. It was much later discovered that stars are heavenly bodies producing their own light like the sun. In the Qur’an, a different word, kawkab, is used to refer to the planets which are celestial bodies that reflect light and do not produce their own light like the sun. “We have adorned the lowest heaven with ornaments, the planets.” Qur’an, 37:6 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwD4PnhEgww Rotation of the sun and expansion of the universe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1gqGAn8y4Q The Glorious Qur'an is compatible with modern Geology Dr. Zakir Naik - Does God exist? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQu7FznVOvI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2s14T6x5AM

Water is essential for all living things. We all know that water is vital to life but the Quran makes a very unusual claim: We made every living thing from water? Will they not believe? (Quran 21:30) In this verse water is pointed out as the origin of all life. All living things are made of cells. We now know that cells are mostly made up of water[3]. For example, 80% of the cytoplasm (basic cell material) of a standard animal cell is described as water in biology textbooks. The fact that living things consist mostly of water was discovered only after the invention of the microscope. In the deserts of Arabia, the last thing someone would have guessed is that all life came from water. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9CX...w&spfreload=10 فيلم مروية ( أسرار ماء زمزم ) "Murwiya Film " The Secret Of Zamzam water الدكتور الألماني كنت فايفر Knut Pfeiffer يكتشف معجزة عظيمة في ماء زمزم https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHm2y1mpTLw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2aGvaEVrMc

الرد على شبهة "امم امثالكم" - د.ويليام كامبل و د. ذاكر نايك https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqjeTcSEqAc هل تدور الشمس حول الارض طبقاً للقرآن؟ - ذاكر نايك Zakir Naik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JcGs4FIuu4 تثبتون صحة القرآن بالعلم الحديث فماذا لو كان العلم خاطئاً؟ - ذاكر نايك Zakir Naik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ2uI1mY2hI ماذا يقصد الله بجمع العظام يوم القيامة وسيسوي البنانه ؟ د ذاكر نايك Dr Zakir Naik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf2gQnmLuvk

Iron is not natural to the earth. It did not form on the earth but came down to earth from outer space. This may sound strange but it’s true. Scientists have found that billions of years ago the earth was stuck by meteorites. These meteorites were carrying Iron from distant stars which had exploded[4]. The Quran says the following on the origin of Iron: “We sent down Iron with its great inherent strength and its many benefits for humankind.” (Quran 57:25) God uses the words ‘sent down’ for Iron. It is clear from the verse that Iron is not an earthly material, but was sent down for the benefit of humanity. The fact that Iron came down to earth from outer space is something which could not be known by the primitive science of the 7th century. بنت تتحدى د.ذاكر نايك اثبات نبؤة سيدنا محمد من كتب الاديان الاخرى غير المسيحية https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKvph5cKXkM ملحد واسئلة قوية جدا يتحدى د.ذاكر نايك بقوله اقنعني واعطني اجابات منطقية ! || والرد الساحق السريع https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PU3Rokjp60E الرد على شبهة القمر و ضوء المنعكس في القرآن - د.ويليام كامبل مع د.ذاكر نايك https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR6_pjfHZPg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUA0EGTGFtg Islamic Miracle, Quran Iron Core Miracles معجزات القرآن الكريم

The sky plays a crucial role in protecting the earth. The sky protects the earth from the lethal rays of the sun. If the sky did not exist then the sun’s radiation would have killed off all life on earth. It also acts like a blanket wrapped around the earth, to protect it from the freezing cold of space. The temperature just above the sky is approximately -270oC. If this temperature was to reach earth then the planet would freeze over instantly. The sky also protects life on earth by warming the surface through heat retention (greenhouse effect), and reducing temperature extremes between day and night[5]. These are some of the many protective functions of the sky. The Quran asks us to consider the sky in the following verse: “We made the sky a protective ceiling. And yet they are turning away from Our signs!” (Quran 21:32) The Quran points to the sky’s protection as a sign of God. The protective properties of the sky were discovered by scientific research conducted in the 20th century. Scientific Facts in the Qur'an: SKY'S Protection https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2H5bH97m5IY The Scientific Miracles of the Qur'an (Perfection of the Creation of the Sky) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fj_rCiw9jnc

The Quran draws our attention to a very important characteristic of mountains: “Did We not make the earth a resting place? And the mountains as stakes?” (Quran 78:6-7) The Quran indicates that mountains have deep roots by using the word stakes to describe them. In fact mountains do have deep roots, and the word stakes is an accurate description for them. A book titled ‘Earth’ by Geophysicist Frank Press explains that mountains are like stakes, and are buried deep under the surface of the earth. Mount Everest (pictured below), the height of which is approximately 9 km above ground, has a root deeper than 125 km. The fact that mountains have deep ‘stake’ like roots was not known, until after the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the beginning of the 20th century. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUaxHUsne7I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHIjPl0EfT0 "the Quran miracles" The formation of mountains(1/3) the Quran miracles" The formation of mountains(2/3)

هل تجسد الله في إنسان؟ Can God Become A Man - YouTube ‫ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLftxUFSTsk الله قادر على كل شيء لما لايتجسد God can do anything w . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWamxd6NK3w ماذا قال الله للمسيح في سورة المائدة - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8PCsFWOHlY رجل وامرأة يمارسان الجنس داخل كنيسة Couple Having Sex in Church http://www.meta http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2680572/couple_having_sex_in_church/ هل جبريل مات أحمد ديدات محاضرة مناظرات - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-ENaNjtSco

At a time when the science of Astronomy was still primitive, the expansion of the universe was described in Quran: “And it is We who have built the Universe with [Our creative] power and keep expanding it.” (Quran 51:47) The fact that the universe is expanding was discovered in the last century. The physicist Stephen Hawking in his book ‘A Brief History of Time’ writes, “The discovery that the universe is expanding was one of the great intellectual revolutions of the 20th century.”. The Quran mentioned the expansion of the universe even before the invention of the telescope! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qPim5Z1UMw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiFQvzGkHzQ

In 1512 the astronomer Nicholas Copernicus put forward his theory that the Sun is motionless at the centre of the solar system, and that the planets revolve around it. The belief that the Sun is stationary was widespread amongst astronomers until the 20th century. It is now a well-established scientific fact that the Sun is not stationary, but is moving in an orbit around the centre of our Milky Way galaxy The Quran mentions the orbit of the Sun: “It is He who created night and day, the Sun and the Moon, each floating in its orbit.” (Quran 21:33) The Quran would have been wrong according to astronomers just a couple of decades ago. But we now know that the Quranic account of the Sun’s motion is consistent with modern Astronomy. Qur'an confirmed by Bible Scholar! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SqO-SxtBUY Bible errors vs. Qur'an Accuracies. Earth, sun, stars, moon Scientific miracles of Qur'an https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpZbZDdfBCM 2015 DEEDAT DESTROYS christian scholar on Quran "error" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9FsxnrsDIQ

Christmas and 25th of December Many Christians are unaware that the true spirit of reverence which Muslims display towards Jesus and his mother Mary spring from the fountainhead of their faith as prescribed in the Holy Quran. Most do not know that a Muslim does not take the name of Jesus , without saying Eesa alai-hiss-salaam i.e. (Jesus peace be upon him). Jesus is commonly considered to have been born on the 25th of December. However, it is common knowledge among Christian scholars that he was not born on this day. It is well known that the first Christian churches held their festival in May, April, or January. Scholars of the first two centuries AD even differ in which year he was born. Some believing that he was born fully twenty years before the current accepted date. So how was the 25th of December selected as the birthday of Jesus ? Grolier's encyclopedia says: "Christmas is the feast of the birth of Jesus Christ, celebrated on December 25 ... Despite the beliefs about Christ that the birth stories expressed, the church did not observe a festival for the celebration of the event until the 4th century.... since 274, under the emperor Aurelian, Rome had celebrated the feast of the "Invincible Sun" on December 25. In the Eastern Church, January 6, a day also associated with the winter solstice, was initially preferred. In course of time, however, the West added the Eastern date as the Feast of the Epiphany, and the East added the Western date of Christmas". So who else celebrated the 25th of December as the birth day of their gods before it was agreed upon as the birth day of Jesus ? Well, there are the people of India who rejoice, decorate their houses with garlands, and give presents to their friends on this day. The people of China also celebrate this day and close their shops. Buddha is believed to have been born on this day. The great savior and god of the Persians, Mithras, is also believed to have been born on the 25th of December long before the coming of Jesus . The Egyptians celebrated this day as the birth day of their great savior Horus, the Egyptian god of light and the son of the "virgin mother" and "queen of the heavens" Isis. Osiris, god of the dead and the underworld in Egypt, the son of "the holy virgin", again was believed to have been born on the 25th of December. The Greeks celebrated the 25th of December as the birthday of Hercules, the son of the supreme god of the Greeks, Zeus, through the mortal woman Alcmene Bacchus, the god of wine and revelry among the Romans (known among the Greeks as Dionysus) was also born on this day. Adonis, revered as a "dying-and-rising god" among the Greeks, miraculously was also born on the 25th of December. His worshipers held him a yearly festival representing his death and resurrection, in midsummer. The ceremonies of his birthday are recorded to have taken place in the same cave in Bethlehem which is claimed to have been the birth place of Jesus . The Scandinavians celebrated the 25th of December as the birthday of their god Freyr, the son of their supreme god of the heavens, Odin. The Romans observed this day as the birthday of the god of the sun, Natalis Solis Invicti ("Birthday of Sol the invincible"). There was great rejoicing and all shops were closed. There was illumination and public games. Presents were exchanged, and the slaves were indulged in great liberties. These are the same Romans who would later preside over the council of Nicea (325 CE) which lead to the official Christian recognition of the "Trinity" as the "true" nature of God, and the "fact" that Jesus was born on the 25th of December too. In Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Gibbon says: "The Roman Christians, ignorant of his (Christ's) birth, fixed the solemn festival to the 25th of December, the Brumalia, or Winter Solstice, when the Pagans annually celebrated the birth of Sol " vol. ii, p. 383. Christians opposed to Christmas There are several Christian groups who are opposed to Christmas. For example, they take the verse from the Bible in Jeremiah 10:2-4 as an admonition against decorating Christmas trees. The King James Version reads: "Thus saith the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen.... For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not." In order to understand this subject, it is helpful to trace some of the history of Christmas avoidance, particularly its roots in Puritanism. The Puritans believed that the first-century church modeled a Christianity that modern Christians should copy. They attempted to base their faith and practice solely on the New Testament, and their position on Christmas reflected their commitment to practice a pure, scriptural form of Christianity. Puritans argued that God reserved to himself the determination of all proper forms of worship, and that he disapproved of any human innovations - even innovations that celebrated the great events of salvation. The name Christmas also alienated many Puritans. Christmas, after all, meant "the mass of Christ." The mass was despised as a Roman Catholic institution that undermined the Protestant concept of Christ, who offered himself once for all. The Puritans' passionate avoidance of any practice that was associated with papal Rome caused them to overlook the fact that in many countries the name for the day had nothing to do with the Catholic mass, but focused instead on Jesus' birth. The mass did not evolve into the form abhorred by Protestants until long after Christmas was widely observed. The two customs had separate, though interconnected, histories. As ardent Protestants, Puritans identified the embracing of Christianity by the Roman Emperor Constantine in the early 300s CE as the starting point of the degeneration and corruption of the church. They believed the corruption of the church was brought on by the interweaving of the church with the pagan Roman state. To Puritans, Christmas was impure because it entered the Roman Church sometime in this period. No one knows the exact year or under what circumstances Roman Christians began to celebrate the birth of their Lord, but by the mid-300s CE, the practice was well established. when Christ was born Ahmed Deedat a lecture debates youtube حكم التهنئة بالكريسماس - ذاكر نايك Zakir Naik https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7X5pDQQ9EU8 when Christ was born Ahmed Deedat a lecture debates youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFfPTgHee6c Christ in Islam a sequel (full studio debate) - Sheikh Ahmed ... ‪ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSWHt5oVAGk \\\

\\\ Ahmed deedat أحمد ديدات يزعزع معتقد النصارى https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppRdp4kFZPQ قس يتحدي ديدات -اثبت ان المسيح لم يصلب و سأعلن إسلامي https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNAWdTvcOr4 احمد ديدات_ اتحدى قداسة البابا و جميع القساوسة و الخاحامات https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pEF8h49r7s اين ذكر محمد في الانجيل ؟ - احمد ديدات ترجمة 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6mmLgXivMU