grim Posted March 18, 2006 Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 (edited) Thanks to Truthseekers inherent stupidity and eagerness not to investigate matters thoroughly but to twist truths, he/he/it posted a matter when checked out thoroughly shows that Rees stood up to a slum lord who owned rental housing in the District, never had a license, exploited poor immigrants and more and in time paid a high price. http://www.stormpages.com/fatgirl/ This pathetic act by Truthseeker actually is an endorsement of Rees as it shows Rees to be a good person. As I read all that Truthseeker and others posted here, twisting of the truth to meet their objective can be seen throughout their postings and anybody who takes the time to thoroughly investigate which Truthseeker and others hope you do not do you will find that Truthseeker and others are posting one lie after another, altering records and this surely cannot be the behavior of concerned citizens but of that of a rival and supporters. If we are going to post here, then let us do so unbiasly. Edited March 18, 2006 by The Grim Reaper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bfrankdc Posted March 18, 2006 Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 For a candidate that is "too conservative" for your tastes, you sure know alot about him, and are finding links and references that I certainlty have never seen. So another case, US vs. Rees...that is five litigations! How many more can we find! B. Frank PS...here is another link to the same web hosting service which shows a "Jonathan Rees & Company" as having been in business since 1979 providing federal filing services for law firms, etc. However, DCRA has no such company on record. http://www.stormpages.com/e/energylaw/ The link provided by the "Grim Reaper" is new to me! Thanks to Truthseekers inherent stupidity and eagerness not to investigate matters thoroughly but to twist truths, he/he/it posted a matter when checked out thoroughly shows that Rees stood up to a slum lord who owned rental housing in the District, never had a license, exploited poor immigrants and more and in time paid a high price. http://www.stormpages.com/fatgirl/ This pathetic act by Truthseeker actually is an endorsement of Rees as it shows Rees to be a good person. As I read all that Truthseeker and others posted here, twisting of the truth to meet their objective can be seen throughout their postings and anybody who takes the time to thoroughly investigate which Truthseeker and others hope you do not do you will find that Truthseeker and others are posting one lie after another, altering records and this surely cannot be the behavior of concerned citizens but of that of a rival and supporters. If we are going to post here, then let us do so unbiasly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grim Posted March 18, 2006 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 Maybe Bfrankdc I just go the extra mile to look up what I post. Most legal process servers who my firm uses are self-employed and also do court filings. I am more interested in hearing about your gay escort service and to know if you ever served Barney Frank? For a candidate that is \"too conservative\" for your tastes, you sure know alot about him, and are finding links and references that I certainlty have never seen. So another case, US vs. Rees...that is five litigations! How many more can we find! B. Frank PS...here is another link to the same web hosting service which shows a \"Jonathan Rees & Company\" as having been in business since 1979 providing federal filing services for law firms, etc. However, DCRA has no such company on record. http://www.stormpages.com/e/energylaw/ The link provided by the \"Grim Reaper\" is new to me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthseeker Posted March 18, 2006 Report Share Posted March 18, 2006 Maybe Bfrankdc I just go the extra mile to look up what I post. Most legal process servers who my firm uses are self-employed and also do court filings. Answer "E": This really has nothing to do with the POINT of the original post, which was that Rees apparently claims to own a court filing company, which at least raises questions about his supposed employment history. I am more interested in hearing about your gay escort service and to know if you ever served Barney Frank? Answer D (ad hominem attack, the well-know last refuge of the guilty) SO predictable http://www.dcmessageboards.com/index.php?showtopic=8140 Thanks to Truthseekers inherent stupidity and eagerness not to investigate matters thoroughly but to twist truths, he/he/it posted a matter when checked out thoroughly shows that Rees stood up to a slum lord who owned rental housing in the District, never had a license, exploited poor immigrants and more and in time paid a high price. http://www.stormpages.com/fatgirl/ This pathetic act by Truthseeker actually is an endorsement of Rees as it shows Rees to be a good person. As I read all that Truthseeker and others posted here, twisting of the truth to meet their objective can be seen throughout their postings and anybody who takes the time to thoroughly investigate which Truthseeker and others hope you do not do you will find that Truthseeker and others are posting one lie after another, altering records and this surely cannot be the behavior of concerned citizens but of that of a rival and supporters. If we are going to post here, then let us do so unbiasly. http://www.dcmessageboards.com/index.php?showtopic=8140 Altering records? Why that sounds like Answer G! (And it's totally wrong. Demonstrably so, too.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gay Posted March 20, 2006 Report Share Posted March 20, 2006 Truthseeker you obviously do not have a job based upon the amount of time you spend on the computer. Possibly Rees just happens to like money and working which might be a foreign word to you. If you have nothing positive to contribute other than your hatefulness then go elsewhere. Answer \"E\": This really has nothing to do with the POINT of the original post, which was that Rees apparently claims to own a court filing company, which at least raises questions about his supposed employment history. Answer D (ad hominem attack, the well-know last refuge of the guilty) SO predictable http://www.dcmessageboards.com/index.php?showtopic=8140 http://www.dcmessageboards.com/index.php?showtopic=8140 Altering records? Why that sounds like Answer G! (And it\'s totally wrong. Demonstrably so, too.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts