goldengirl

My personal favorite... "Coca Cola said it would never give away its' secret formula but I will on what I believe will in time prove to be a trend in DC political campaigning." Then for the climax 2 paragraphs later... "I do not run around town professing to have a secret formula to win with" Can't even carry out a solid thought in one posting. No wonder Jonathan Rees has so much trouble keeping up with all of his aliases.

Okay first: that pesky problem you're having with hiding the IP address from your postings. Well after considerable thought, here is how you can fix it. First of all, you're going to have to quit repeating posts under the same name. Continue hiding/scrambling your IP address, but make every post from a different name claiming to have 'just happened to stumble onto the DC messageboards'. This should make your case bulletproof. Second: those irksome facts proving your allegations wrong. This problem required slightly more time, but there might be a solution. Luckily for you, you don't seem to notice the difference between reality and a fantasy world. There shouldn't be any ethical conflict as far as 'the truth' is concerned. Third and probably most troublesome: the problem of having a substantial campaign consisting of anything other than paltry posters (I've still yet to see) and internet postings to a skeptical few. Keep up the good work! You really are revolutionizing the kind of smearing that can be done from one campaign. It's admirable really. Touting your abhorrent posters and email subscription lists is really a step in the right direction (granted the majority of the emails get filtered to junk). Fabulous job Jonathan Rees and kudos on your finance report (oh, that's right, you STILL haven't filed, silly me, I thought you would have by the 31st with all the support you have, surely you've raised more than $500 dollars? I guess not). I'm sure there is more to be addressed, but there is only so much time in a day and I only possess finite patience.

Rees et al -- You should stick to lying about things that aren't part of the public record, and things that aren't so easily refutable. A quick look at Sam's report shows that everything you just wrote is inaccurate. 'Out-of-DC contributions, only 1k in Ward 3' Wrong. Well over 1k came from Ward 3. Even a cursory examination of the report shows as much. 'Paying his rent, food with campaign money.' Wrong. He has no payment for rent on his report. He has payed a majority of his expenses to a firm called Momentum Analysis. He has several meals and food/catering expenses (six total) -- he is required by law to list those meals if they're directly or indirectly supporting his campaign. (Thus, fundraising expenses and meals for volunteers must be reported as campaign expenditures. BY LAW. Though you don't know much about following the law, so this is pretty foreign to you.) Let's also be clear: He's raised $28,150 in the first reporting period. You've raised less than $500. Again, your intellect is dizzying.

Maybe I missed something 'Joan'...what have I lied about? What facts am I wrong about? Please, I would very much like to be enlightened...

This of course coming from a candidate who did not even file a financial report as he is under the impression he can win the election for less than $500. I don't know about the rest of you, but I implicitly trust someone on financial matters with such obvious common sense. And what national board for the elderly? Do you mean Rees is now harassing some poor nursing home residents by posting things on their bulletin board? I do feel for anyone who is going to be subjected to Rees' campaigning (read stalking) over the next many months.

Nice story with the 'computer store' that's very believable. How long did it take you to come up with that? And Rees, you really should consider sitting down with your massive support force and well, giving them a grammar lesson. It's quite remarkable really, everyone in your little clan appears to make the same mistakes time after time. Or perhaps you're all a member of the same cult. Yes, that makes sense...in fact that seems to be the most plausible explanation to date. By the way 'Joan', Rees has been involved in this himself and posted as himself on many occasions. He has also managed to slip up and reveal himself posing as other aliases. So continue to live in your fantasy world, and if I may, excellent financial report (Oh, that's right you didn't file one). You claim you can't win a campaign from behind a computer? How do you plan to do it staying under the $500 limit? Those must be some GREAT posters. And what happened to your yahoo group?? Unsatisfied with your 3 members?

Rees, Jason, Miss Glover Park, etc (this is really getting old), You have still yet to produce anything we in the real world refer to as 'evidence' of these blasphemous allegations. I'm hoping you've finished your lengthy finance report and that is why you have so much free time to spend on the message boards and make up names today? (Of course if you haven't raised any moeny, it makes the task a menial one)

Dear Rees, Yahoo Moderator, Tammy, Whatever: First of all, if you're defending your posts on Yahoo, why don't you post as yourself instead of making up yet ANOTHER alias. Second, as a plea for future generations and in the interest of fairness for other people who just mightwant to register on yahoo, dcmessageboards etc, PLEASE stop using up all of the screen names. By now you must have accumulated at least 107 and well, it is a little selfish don't you think? So the next time you feel the urge to make up another name, look through the long list of aliases you already have and try a little conservation. I'm sure it would behoove your campaign to promote an agenda of cutting out waste and I think we've got a prime example right here. Thanks from all of us!

Rees, Tammy Bresloff, whoever you are today: How does quasi (or perhaps full blown) stalking Sam Brooks aid your campaign in any way?

Wow, way to pose as a Gordon supporter Rees. Your intellect is dizzying.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight Keep up the good work.

Again, referring to yourself in third person, a common fallout of schizophrenia. Remarkable.

I guess a side affect of always posting under a fake name is a tendency to talk about yourself in third person. I guess with your schizophrenia, that makes sense.

Because I'm not running for public office, so I don't have to account for my free time. And what about your fundraising....I hear 'great' things :)

If 95% of the voters don't care, then why do you spend 95% of your time on here and various other message boards impersonating multiple people and accusing yourself and others of heinous crimes? And I'll ask again, how's the fundraising going?

Oh please let me take this one.... You don't suppose Rees would impersonate someone else do you? Or make up a lie? Blasphemous! Pam, you're not fooling anyone. Just because all of your other Dice Clay, Rees, whatever aliases are blocked and this is the only one you can get through, doesn't mean we don't know it's you. Get over yourself. By the way, you still haven't answered about the fundraising...how's that going?

Pam, Rees, MissGlover Park, et al: Remarkable. Your obvious inability to grasp reality. Have you ever seen a movie? Particularly one where the good guys, upon realizing what the bad guy is up to, tend to get together and try stop him? Some examples of this: War of the Worlds, Signs, Forbidden Planet, even Harry Potter. (Yes I agree, it is a strange coincidence that comparison of you and your actions quickly remind me of aliens and evil wizards) A similar phenomena can also be found in 'real' life with actual 'police officers'. Well Dear, I think you should prepare yourself for Jonathan Rees (if that is in fact your real name) against the world. And by the way, how's the fundraising going?

Rees, Pam, Andrew, et al, I've got the say, the levels you're reaching with your schizophrenia are admirable. Your tenacity in coming up with new aliases, accusations, and never ending assualts (with the same tactics I might add) is incredibly impressive. If nothing else comes out of this election for you, I sincerely hope you get to be a case study. That you're capable of carrying on what you claim to be a normal, contributing life in society, well, I think you should be commended. Generally people with your disorder (at least advanced to the stage you're in) are locked up in padded rooms. Best of luck!