truthseeker

See what happens when you feed peanuts to the vermin? They start coming back again and again. (Just as I expect an abortive attempt at a zingy one-liner by MissJonAngelaTammyPark will follow this post. ) DON'T FEED THE TROLLS.

Factchecker2, how can you POSSIBLY accuse Tammy of being another R--s alter? What are you, Sam Brooks or something? Just kidding ;-) (obviously.) With undying admiration, NSB, NBF

Must......not............post. Must....not.....post xo, NSB, NBF

Thank you for clearing this up for me so quickly! I think anyone who reads the above will understand -exactly- where you're coming from. Night all. Faithfully, Not SB, nor BF

'Tammy" My interest is, as always, in truth and justice and fair play. I don't know for whom I'd vote if I lived in DC, as it's still early in the political year. Even so, I certainly know whom I'd vote -against- and with great enthusiasm. He's a dangerous and allegedly unstable person, but I've vowed not to invoke his name again tonight.

Well, I'm not a high-level philanthropist, if you get my drift Yes! I write. Automatic writing mostly. And the ocassional epigram. I've sold a few pieces to Photoplay, but not recently As for my political life, I support the Wobblies agenda, though I'm not a hardliner.

I'm engaged in a number of volunteer projects myself. I also work in business, in the US. I enjoy tandem bicycling, writing symbolist poetry and inventing things. I am a low-level philanthropist and am pursuing an advanced degree in biostatistical criticism.

Say G'night to Jonathan for me! (OOPS. Time to go to a RDA meeting I guess.)

Cool. I know the folks who run the volunteer program at House of Ruth. I'll tell them I met you online when I talk to them, probably tomorrow!!

Cool. Which organizations have you volunteered for locally? Volunteering is great!!

So, you seem politically astute. How do you come by your political insight?

Welcome Tammy! Tell us a little bit about yourself!!!

After a brief slip, it's now Hour Three of ignoring MissJohnAngelaParkSmith in earnest. With your help, I believe I can kick this affliction. Each hour I grow stronger. Join me everyone, won't you? You'll be glad you did. It's like a great burden has been lifted. No longer do I feel compelled to answer every inane post. Perhaps a support group is in order. RDA or "R--s Debunkers Anonymous". Our motto: "Let The Washington Post Do It Instead." Or perhaps "God grant me the serenity to ignore R--s's psychotic bleatings." Whatever works best for you.

whatever.

CL tries to keep up (I've actually corresponded briefly with Mr. Newmark about his efforts to do so. Not very happy was he about The Unnameable One's bragging about intentionally violating CL rules (calling it a "smart marketing ploy" on DCist.) They ban The U. O. repeatedly, but with only mixed longterm result. Y'know...on accounta MissJohnAngelaParks congenital tendency to sneakiness. The l'il proxie pixie ;-) I also saw the post on DCist today. Shameful, but not surprising. (Update: DCist just took that racist post down. See, THAT's good board moderation.) Love, NSB, NBF

I'd like to suggest again that we take the Ignoring Him plan seriously. MissJohnAngela can continue posting here, leaving a nice permanent trail of evidence (including all the links we've posted) for journalists to discover at a later date. If you discover anything else, sure, post it. But for now, it's clear that we've done what we can. It's just a waste of time to respond to fallacies and figments, and it merely triggers the crazy gene. I suspect that, save for 3 actual non-Rees people post here, all other genuine voters and candidates have long ago abandoned this apparently completely-unmoderated board, the only place left where the Unnameable One is still permitted to wreak unrestrained havoc. Let him have his toy, but take away his audience. I suggest, meanwhile, telling all your friends and voters what you've witnessed here and encourage them to volunteer for any other candidate BUT MissJohnAngela. Love Always, Not Brooks, Not Bfrank

Clearly, attention of any kind only feeds his mania. Let's leave him and the alters to chat with each other. Abandoning him to the lonely playground of DC pages (there are only like 4 non-Rees posters here anymore anyway) might be the best containment policy of all. Yes, he'll continue to libel, lie and propagandize, but he'll do it anyway. Just a thought.

First of all, you seem to forget that the burden of proof, as it were, appropriately lies with the person WHO IS RUNNING FOR PUBLIC OFFICE. In any case, this whole "gay symbolism" thing? This is utterly bizarre and embarassing on your part. And I'm fascinated that a so-called champion of gay rights (yeah, sure) would stoop to this, and the previous homophobic comments. And don't even TRY to tell me it's not you posting that crap, Rees. You've done it elsewhere, we all have the screen shots from Craigslist, DCist, and the yahoogroups from which you and your alters are now banned. Ugh, I need to go wash your filth off me now.

Well, count me out. Unless you want to send me a plane ticket. Really, this is the stupidest mock-challenge yet. Love and Huggs, Not Sam Brooks or BFrank PS: Anyone but Rees for Councilman, 2006. If only I could vote in DC

Way to go, B! You're indefatigable, which is more than I can say for myself. Wears me out, untangling the ragged knots of schizo-affective "logic." And no, I'm Not Sam Brooks. Or, as you know, You.

That's a conFABulous anecdote! Thanks for sharing.

You're making my point FOR me, doll. I told you, I only use one IP address. And you giving ME computer advice is funny as hell, for reasons that I won't share with you. You'd be embarassed if you knew, though. I take that back. You are apparently un-embarassable.

whatever.

Posting that "you heard" that Rees was kicked off doesn't prove anything. And besides, as you so repetitively point out , anyone can be anyone on the internet. You, just as a crazy hypothetical farout example, could be, say, for example, Rees. Or anyone. You've proven nothing. Yet again. Hoist by your own pitard. Yet Again. This is too easy, and thus tiresome. By for now. Love Ya Lots, Not Sam Brooks or Bfrank.

Nor are they on here complaining, like you have, that "no one is focussing on the issues." More circular logic, (the hallmark of several of the scarier listings in the DSM-IV.) I don't blame them for not bothering with this board. It's a horrorshow. No REAL candidate would sink this low. I regret being here myself. So off I go.