Jump to content
Washington DC Message Boards

JONATHAN REES vs. SAM BROOKS


Recommended Posts

READ WHAT THE WASHINGTON TIMES & INTOWNER NEWSPAPERS SAYS ABOUT CANDIDATE REES

 

http://www.dc2006.net/washtimes.pdf

http://www.dc2006.net/intowner2006.pdf

 

Rees is the only ward 3 candidate who has openly advocated and has laid out plans for

 

1. Lower income taxes.

2. Lower property taxes.

3. Higher standard deduction and personal exemption rates.

4. Downscaling the size of DC Government.

5. Tax incentives to lure major industry into DC.

 

READ WHAT THE WASHINGTON POST SAYS ABOUT SAM BROOKS

 

In 2004 when Samuel A.C. Brooks ran for city council at large, the Washington Post warned everybody to just SAY NO TO SAM BROOKS when they wrote on September 11, 2004 at Page A20:

 

1. The District Deserves a better choice for City Council;

 

2. He doesn't come anywhere close in the needed experience overall in representing this city;

 

3. He is long on energy and ambition but short on (community) experience, and lacks substantiate knowledge of the problems confronting the city or the ideas for solving them; and

 

4. The District needs someone who knows how the government works, is familiar with the city other than through a door to door campaign and who doesn't need on the job training in the basics.

Fact, none of the nine ward 3 candidates have laid out an economic policy for the District of Columbia to follow except Jonathan Rees but this is die to the fact that Jonathan Rees is a business man in the purist sense.

 

VOTERS THE CHOICE FOR WARD 3 IS A NO BRAINER BECAUSE THE BUSINESS OF GOVERNMENT IS BUSINESS AND ONLY JONATHAN REES HAS THE BUSINESS SAVVY TO MAKE THE CITY COUNCIL FUNCTION EFFICIENTLY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest

Fact, none of the nine ward 3 candidates have laid out an economic policy for the District of Columbia to follow except Jonathan Rees but this is die to the fact that Jonathan Rees is a business man in the purist sense.[/b]

 

VOTERS THE CHOICE FOR WARD 3 IS A NO BRAINER BECAUSE THE BUSINESS OF GOVERNMENT IS BUSINESS AND ONLY JONATHAN REES HAS THE BUSINESS SAVVY TO MAKE THE CITY COUNCIL FUNCTION EFFICIENTLY!

 

 

I'd think that Ward 3 would deserve someone who reads and writes above a sixth-grade level. Embarassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest

Cutting and pasting means reporters not me cannot write well.

 

 

 

Fact, none of the nine ward 3 candidates have laid out an economic policy for the District of Columbia to follow except Jonathan Rees but this is die to the fact that Jonathan Rees is a business man in the purist sense.[/b]

 

VOTERS THE CHOICE FOR WARD 3 IS A NO BRAINER BECAUSE THE BUSINESS OF GOVERNMENT IS BUSINESS AND ONLY JONATHAN REES HAS THE BUSINESS SAVVY TO MAKE THE CITY COUNCIL FUNCTION EFFICIENTLY!

I'd think that Ward 3 would deserve someone who reads and writes above a sixth-grade level. Embarassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest

MEDIA DEEMS CANDIDATE SAM BROOKS A DEAD FISH

 

 

It appears that ward 3 candidate Sam Brooks is already broke, has stopped campaigning on the streets of ward 3, has been exposed by the media as being biased toward the elderly, having sold out the glbt community with contributions from notable homophobes and has been judge no longer a serious candidate.

 

Sam Brooks’s affiliation with notable homophobes and teaming up with a well known narco trafficker may have been the beginning of the quick end to his campaign...

 

Read this <> http://thelyingeyesofsambrooks.blogspot.com/

 

Now you judge it all for yourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...