Jump to content
Washington DC Message Boards

Fire U.S. Special Counsel Scott Bloch


Guest POGO
 Share

Recommended Posts

On May 6, 2008, FBI agents raided Bloch's offices. NPR and the Wall Street Journal reported that the raids were in relation to an investigation into allegations of obstruction of justice by Bloch's office. The New York Times reported that the investigation concerned whether Bloch had hired an a private computer-help company, Geeks on Call, to "scrub" computer files to prevent an inquiry into whether he had violated the Hatch Act by mixing politics with his job, which is to shield whistleblowers.

 

As part of an investigation into destruction of evidence, Bloch's person was searched and two portable memory devices were recovered.

 

 

The Honorable Joshua Bolten

 

Chief of Staff

 

The White House

 

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

 

Washington, DC 20500

 

Via facsimile: (202) 456-0192

 

Dear Mr. Bolten:

 

I am writing to urge you to remove the U.S. Special Counsel Scott Bloch from his position. Last Friday, the Office of Special Counsel’s (OSC) Deputy Jim Byrne resigned. His departure removes a vital barrier protecting the OSC’s staff from further retaliation and intimidation by Mr. Bloch and signals a disturbing downward spiral for the agency, which is supposed to protect whistleblowers, prosecute Hatch Act violations, and perform other vital duties.

 

As you know, Mr. Bloch was subject to an unprecedented FBI raid involving two dozen agents earlier this year. My organization, the Project On Government Oversight (POGO), was party to the complaint filed three years ago that resulted in the Office of Personnel Management Inspector General (OPM IG) investigation into Mr. Bloch and now the related FBI investigation.

 

The Special Counsel has statutory protection from being dismissed from office in order to maintain his independence. However, he can be removed for malfeasance, neglect of duty, or inefficiency. I understand malfeasance and neglect of duty might be somewhat difficult to prove conclusively without the finalized OPM IG investigation. However, two federal judges in Washington, DC, and Virginia approved invasive search warrants, which have high standards of probable cause, indication a strong belief by the judges that Mr. Bloch not only engaged in misconduct but that he committed a crime. These search warrants were executed to seize information from his office, his home, and his person.

 

Furthermore, it is quite simple to prove that Mr. Bloch’s continued presence in the office is causing gross inefficiency at the OSC. To wit:

 

Communications between Mr. Bloch and his staff are seriously impaired given that nearly 20 current and former staff members have been subpoenaed to provide evidence or appear before the Grand Jury considering Mr. Bloch’s possible indictment. It is an untenable situation that witnesses continue to be subjected to the supervision of Mr. Bloch while they are being called upon to provide evidence to the Grand Jury concerning his wrongdoing. As previous letters to White House General Counsel Fred Fielding from our attorney Debra Katz have documented, Mr. Bloch and his deputies have repeatedly attempted to interfere and intimidate witnesses involved in the OPM IG’s investigation.

 

Staff at the agency have expressed concern that Mr. Bloch’s private attorney is poised to depose them. This undoubtedly has created a chilling effect on staff who must interact with Mr. Bloch on a daily basis.

 

In yet another sign of how the agency is being harmed by Mr. Bloch’s leadership, the OSC’s reauthorization bill is being held up by Congress because Mr. Bloch remains as Special Counsel. This reauthorization bill is urgently needed to enact long-overdue reforms to the agency.

 

Staff at the agency report that their ability to perform many of their duties has been harmed by the shadow cast by Mr. Bloch’s leadership. Other agencies are reportedly refusing to respond to OSC inquiries, preventing the OSC from conducting its statutorily required investigations and oversight.

 

As a result, I am imploring that you recommend to the President that he remove Mr. Bloch from office. At the very least, Mr. Bloch should be put on administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigation and Grand Jury. This is the only fair course of action for the employees of the agency and for the taxpayers who depend on a functioning OSC to ensure that the government is honest and accountable.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

Danielle Brian

 

Executive Director

 

cc: White House Counsel Fred Fielding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...