dattaswami Posted September 23, 2007 Report Posted September 23, 2007 God is unknowable If you say that He is this and – He is not that, it means That you have understood God, – None knows God, Gita says this, – only God knows God, Veda says. If you say that you know God – you must be God. You say that you are awareness – and that awareness is God. Yes, you are only awareness – you know yourself, we agree. But awareness is not God – since you know awareness, yourself. Every one is awareness like you, – if God is awareness, Every body knows God, – then, how Gita said that None knows God, – then, how Vedas say that If any body says that he knows God, – he does not know God at all, if any body says that – he does not know God He knows God, – this means God is unknowable. Advaitins have misunderstood – even the theory-class, Advaita or monism is limited – to human incarnation only, It should not be extended to – every human being here. Advaita applies to Shankara, – He is human incarnation. He swallowed molten lead, – followers could not do so. He clearly filtered human beings – from Him by this miracle. He told “Shivah Kevaloham”, – it means that He alone is God. You have misunderstood Advaita – in the very first step itself By extending it to all humanity – so that you become God. This shows your ambition – to become omnipotent God. Soham means that you are God, – this is the final eternal fruit. It is possible but you have to – travel in a special path, it is Dasoham, which means that – you are humble servant to God. The address of God to serve is – the human incarnation here. The care in service is that – you should never aspire for soham. Hanuman studied Gita from Sun, – God told Gita to Sun, first, He understood that Advaita is fruit, – Dvaita is the path to reach it. With utmost care, He served His - contemporary human incarnation. He received the fruit, – Ramayana is the practical procedure, After understanding theory, Veda, – from Sun, returned to earth. Advaitin has not understood – even the theory told by Shankara, The Sun of knowledge on earth, – but follower is not Hanuman! The follower is only a monkey – jumping quickly from right Interpretation to wrong interpretation, - how can he come to The practical procedure? – Ramayana is just a story for him. Rama is Datta testing devotees severely, – first He masked Himself With thick ignorance to impress that – He is a common man. All His life is only examination of devotees, – no preaching here. All the preaching was over – in the upper world for devotees. He never showed miracles, – Lakshmana left his wife for Rama. He acted as a watchman – while Rama enjoyed Sita in hut. Rama showed climax of love to wife – by running for deer. Rama overacted by weeping for wife, – all this is to divert Lakshmana towards his wife, – Lakshmana was firm and never Misunderstood Rama for His lust, - Rama acted as incapable In several occasions, – Hanuman solved all His problems, Some times Hanuman showed – miracles to help Rama, But Hanuman always praised Rama – as omnipotent God, Hanuman never thought himself – as God, only servant. Every step of Ramayana – is a message for Pravrutti externally, But internally every step is – a test in the end of Nivrutti. Similarly Bhagavatam is a test – of Nivrutti for the sages. Krishna acted as a thief and – over showed lust for ladies. But the sages recognized Him – and surrendered totally to Him. Mahabharatha shows the failures – of Pandavas in Nivrutti. Even Dharma Raja, a leader in Pravtutti – could not succeed. The places of failure are also important – to know for avoiding. These three epics are – the laboratory – manuals after theory. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.