Sam Brooks Watch

This matter was no secret but to use it and advocate people should not vote for a man over it would be absurd because how many are not doing such? Get real.

They are proabably all of Rees people.

It is none of your business most voters will feel how many times a man has been married. You will be seen as crossing the line. Again, his private life is none of your business and you are making fools of yourselves on the issue. Find something he says on his website and then find evidence that he is wrong, he tried it before and it failed or find something like maybe he caused an employer a major loss but not the crap you all are coming with. We were given evidence by prominient men in the gay community that Sam Brooks has been sleeping with older men and then taking money for it. That is his private business and should never be used to attack his candidacy and thus we would never use it as that is a private thing.

All of you are focusing on all the wrong stuff in your effort to discredit a candidate and it is not working. Why? Because how many people out there have been married or divorced a few times? How many men have children out of wedlock? Right, in 2006 nobody cares and all these issues you have been using for months are not phasing voters but may be turning people off and in favor of the guy you are attacking as dipping into the family life is a big no no in 2006 and turn people off. Think about it. Our blogs will come slowly and they will contain matters that will turn peoples heads and it will not contain the dumb things all of you use unsuccessfully.

Bfrank, you are about 9 months behind the curve. This case cited was cited back in August 2005 by someone named DC Info and Rees mocked it and then used that name Jackson to tease with. The case cited involved another Jonathan R. Rees who then was employed by Lyndon LaRouche here in DC who married some woman from Central America which we suspect was a rouse to help her get a Green Card. This Jonathan R. Rees is in prison now and was sent there by the US District Court in Alexandria as a result of credit card fraud at the same time LaRouche was locked away. Are you catching on? Some make mistakes thinking that found damning information, they post these erroneous matters, Rees sees the errors and then he mocks everyone by having the gall to take names out of the postings and have these people say nice things about him. Are you catching on. We will have a nice blog about him soon and we will not make these errors others have.

Bfrank, you are about 9 months behind the curve. This case cited was cited back in August 2005 by someone named DC Info and Rees mocked it and then used that name Jackson to tease with. The case cited involved another Jonathan R. Rees who then was employed by Lyndon LaRouche here in DC who married some woman from Central America which we suspect was a rouse to help her get a Green Card. This Jonathan R. Rees is in prison now and was sent there by the US District Court in Alexandria as a result of credit card fraud at the same time LaRouche was locked away. Are you catching on? Some make mistakes thinking that found damning information, they post these erroneous matters, Rees sees the errors and then he mocks everyone by having the gall to take names out of the postings and have these people say nice things about him. Are you catching on. We will have a nice blog about him soon and we will not make these errors others have.

Is this case: 1. Jonathan R. Rees the candidate; 2. Jonathan R. Rees the business manager for Lyndon LaRouche or 3. Jonathan R. Rees the lawyer Which one is it? Jonathan R. Rees the candidate was married to Maria Cisneros in 1973 and she died in June 1998 so this could not be Jonathan R. Rees the candidate and the public record shows that they lived at 235 East Green Valley Circle, Newark, Delaware and had a home also here in DC on Wisconsin Ave NW.

We are a group of people who have been listening carefully to what each candidate has said from one forum to the next which is verifiable and not hearsay but mainly their own words spoken and this is what we base our claim on as to contradictions. All else is based upon official records. We will be doing a blog on each candidate.

Would you vote for a Democratic candidate that says that he supports gay rights but turns around and accepts 1/3 of his campaign financing from gay hating Republicans? Check out this two faced liar and leave a message for him on the blog! http://thelyingeyesofsambrooks.blogspot.com/ Thanks,

Would you vote for a Democratic candidate that says that he supports gay rights but turns around and accepts 1/3 of his campaign financing from gay hating Republicans? Check out this two faced liar and leave a message for him on the blog! http://thelyingeyesofsambrooks.blogspot.com/ Thanks, Would you vote for a Democratic candidate that says that he supports gay rights but turns around and accepts 1/3 of his campaign financing from gay hating Republicans? Check out this two faced liar and leave a message for him on the blog! http://thelyingeyesofsambrooks.blogspot.com/ Thanks,

Would you vote for a Democratic candidate that says that he supports gay rights but turns around and accepts 1/3 of his campaign financing from gay hating Republicans? Check out this two faced liar and leave a message for him on the blog! http://thelyingeyesofsambrooks.blogspot.com/ Thanks,

http://thelyingeyesofsambrooks.blogspot.com/