bfrankdc

I don't know about the names you have posted, as I am B. Frank. Can you explain why posts appear under your name JRR and "missgloverpark" on the NBC thread at 5:49 am, 6:30am and 7:22am from the SAME IP ADDRESS? B. Frank

Pretty easy, actually, For some reason, since yesterday, the IP address of each post started to appear in the upper right hand corner of each post. I went back to the summer and tracked the IP logs for the posts in question and compiled them into a single Word document. I then organized them by their natural root IP groupings. The result is what you see posted. Luke Wilbur can easily verify this information. Can you explain why these posts and "different aliases" appear under similar groupings of IP addresses? It seems way too convenient. It also fits the Modus Operendi of your postings on DCist, and probably other blogs and Listservs. I suspect that if one wanted to follow up with DCist Martin, or Craig Newmark (of Craig's List), or Yahoo, we will see a similar IP trail, but under still more aliases. "missgloverpark" was able to identify my IP address, as well as the IP addresses of other posters here. Do you think "she" is the only one with access to such information? I eagerly await your explanation. B. Frank To further add, the IP addresses for "JRR" and "missgloverpark on THIS thread are both 141.156.148.191. This is true of the posts at 5:49 am, 6:30 am and 7:22 am. Is "missgloverpark" in your workplace, at your place of domocile, or otherwise on your computer? Did you not see her there within minutes of your posting? OR, is the more plausible explanation true? B. Frank

Mr. Rees, You cannot ignore the truth, and it appears that this is one lie that will be difficult to explain away. I fear the house of cards are falling. B. Frank

Mr. Rees, I have merely compiled and posted the IP logs as reported by DC Pages. Please let me know specifically where any information I have posted is false, and I will provide a link to the appropriate post. Board owner Luke Wilbur can easily confirm what I have posted. B. Frank

I think you are beyond paranoid, Mr. Rees. Do you dispute the IP information I have posted which directly links your IP addresses and self-created aliases to the IP addresses of many of the psuedonymns which have been pervasive thoughout the DCPages message board? How do you account for the names including yours, missgloverpark, CUMES, and others who "we" have been conversing with? Is it coincidence that there are groups of aliases connected by the same root IP address? If these were really a mulititude of different posters, there would be much more variety in the IP addresses (prior to your discovery and disclosure of Proxy IP addresses). Indeed, you and your aliases have given me quite an education about Proxy IP addresses, false registrations and general split-personality disorders. You can see that the others that you cite (factchecker and truthseeker), consistently use their own IP addresses which are distinct from mine. It appears that none of us are hiding behind a proxy IP, as you are (evidenced by virtue of the code errors which persist in the posts of you, missgloverpark, Angela, Tammy and the other aliases you have created). If you think your rants against me are going to help your cause, you are mistaken. You have created your own hole, and the record on these pages are but one place where voters and journalists are and will check the veracity and sanity of your person. B. Frank

I cannot believe I spent the time to do this, but here is but a small sample of what I found, thanks to DC Pages: Jason Rees 12/26/2005 64.27.5.168 missgloverpark 1/8/2006 64.27.5.168 _____________________________________________ Jonathon Rees 10/20/2005 4.249.120.196 Jonathon Rees 9/16/2005 4.429.114.203 jrrees2006 10/21/2005 4.249.111.21 4.249.114.197 Jason Rees 12/20/2005 4.249.120.122 S. Jackson 10/9/2005 4.249.114.150 Angela Biddy 10/9/2005 4.249.120.203 Lester Graham 10/8/2005 4.249.117.63 NikDix 8/21/2005 4.249.117.40 Mindy 9/1/2005 4.249.117.209 Mindy 10/6/2005 4.249.114.179 Hector Cruz 10/8/2005 4.249.120.206 Mindy Silverman 6/24/2005 4.249.111.214 Cindy Jenkins 8/24/2005 4.249.117.12 Linda Spector 10/8/2005 4.249.117.63 Margie Clay 9/16/2005 4.249.117.147 Guest_Alex 9/1/2005 4.249.222.241 Juan Antonio Sanchez 8/24/2005 4.249.117.12 Gabriella Rees 10/18/2005 4.249.117.75 Joanne Kaurfman 10/19/2005 4.249.114.252 Josh Lambert 10/19/2005 4.249.114.252 Kathy Patterson 10/11/2005 4.249.114.172 Kathleen Roddy 6/16/2005 4.249.120.106 Jonathon Rees 10/16/2005 4.249.111.217 James Ray Smith 12/31/2005 4.249.120.126 missgloverpark 4.249.117.105 (1/3/2006) 4.249.117.190 (1/6/2006) Tammy Bresloff 1/5/2006 4.249.117.177 __________________________ jrrees 10/28/2005 138.88.109.176 Rapmasterjohnny 12/20/2005 138.88.72.151 Rapmasterjohnny 11/15/2005 138.88.27.191 CUMES 11/21/2005 138.88.67.17 Roddy 10/24/2005 138.88.107.240 Roddy 10/25/2005 138.88.170.38 Roddy 10/24/2005 138.88.107.240 pitts 10/25/2005 138.88.41.170 __________________________ I hope everyone can now see the proof in the pudding. Unless that is, this is one HUGE coincidence. B. Frank

Please see my most recent post in the "BFrank and the Anonymous Proxies" thread. B. Frank

I cannot believe I spent the time to do this, but here is but a small sample of what I found, thanks to DC Pages: Jason Rees 12/26/2005 64.27.5.168 missgloverpark 1/8/2006 64.27.5.168 _____________________________________________ Jonathon Rees 10/20/2005 4.249.120.196 Jonathon Rees 9/16/2005 4.429.114.203 jrrees2006 10/21/2005 4.249.111.21 4.249.114.197 Jason Rees 12/20/2005 4.249.120.122 S. Jackson 10/9/2005 4.249.114.150 Angela Biddy 10/9/2005 4.249.120.203 Lester Graham 10/8/2005 4.249.117.63 NikDix 8/21/2005 4.249.117.40 Mindy 9/1/2005 4.249.117.209 Mindy 10/6/2005 4.249.114.179 Hector Cruz 10/8/2005 4.249.120.206 Mindy Silverman 6/24/2005 4.249.111.214 Cindy Jenkins 8/24/2005 4.249.117.12 Linda Spector 10/8/2005 4.249.117.63 Margie Clay 9/16/2005 4.249.117.147 Guest_Alex 9/1/2005 4.249.222.241 Juan Antonio Sanchez 8/24/2005 4.249.117.12 Gabriella Rees 10/18/2005 4.249.117.75 Joanne Kaurfman 10/19/2005 4.249.114.252 Josh Lambert 10/19/2005 4.249.114.252 Kathy Patterson 10/11/2005 4.249.114.172 Kathleen Roddy 6/16/2005 4.249.120.106 Jonathon Rees 10/16/2005 4.249.111.217 James Ray Smith 12/31/2005 4.249.120.126 missgloverpark 4.249.117.105 (1/3/2006) 4.249.117.190 (1/6/2006) Tammy Bresloff 1/5/2006 4.249.117.177 __________________________ jrrees 10/28/2005 138.88.109.176 Rapmasterjohnny 12/20/2005 138.88.72.151 Rapmasterjohnny 11/15/2005 138.88.27.191 CUMES 11/21/2005 138.88.67.17 Roddy 10/24/2005 138.88.107.240 Roddy 10/25/2005 138.88.170.38 Roddy 10/24/2005 138.88.107.240 pitts 10/25/2005 138.88.41.170 __________________________ I hope everyone can now see the proof in the pudding. Unless that is, this is one HUGE coincidence. B. Frank

It's true. I admit it. What you posted is true, that is my IP address. Your flaw in logic however, is assuming that the three different posters in question are infact the same people, which is not true. I am B. Frank. The other two are just that. Two other people with their own IP addresses. I believe their IP addresses have been consistent as has mine. We are all different people. Get it? Please provide a link showing ANY of the other posters coming from my IP address. Please provide a link to other aliases using my IP address. Hint: you won't be able to find it because it has never happened. I do not know who they are, and they certainly have never used my computer. B. Frank

Except my IP address is not as you say it is. And in looking at it, neither is "truthseeker"s what you say it is. Are you really this dumb? (hint...look in the upper right hand corner of the posts. For example, "your" IP address is 141.156.148.191) B. Frank

It is amazing all the new information I am learning about proxy IP addresses from "missgloverpark". I use no IP proxy programs, and my IP address has been consistent. It appears that the board moderator has activated an IP screen, so everyone can see the IP addresses of each poster. I will stay logged in, so my single identity is verifyable. By the way, at least I use my name, unlike some posters, missgloverpark ** cough cough ** B. Frank

Mr. Rees, Unlike you (where it has been proven by DCist -- refer to the archives which I have posted here), I do not post under multiple aliases, but rather only use my name, which is B. Frank. In the past two days, you have used multiple aliases here, by your own admission. You don't think that employment history and educational background are vital pieces of information to which voters are entitled when considering their candidate? What misinformation have I posted? Please provide details. Laughing out loud at the concept of obesessions coming from your typing fingers, given the number of posts that you have made, just here, in the past 24 hours. I don't give a rat's behind about Mr. Brooks. B. Frank

Very convenient, except that "your candidate", Mr. Rees, reported the following: _____________ "According to today’s early morning NBC news, there are about 6-7 people running for the ward 3 council seat and it will probably come down to whose names gets known most and not issues. Kathy Patterson was briefly interviewed on the number of people seeking to succeed her and she agreed that name recognition by people who mostly do not pay attention to issues will decide who succeeds her. I say three of the candidates have a strong campaign and the others very weak and/or small one. Candidates Cheh and Gordon who are very decent people said that my distribution network is a force to reckon with and probably the other candidates cannot do what I have and that is, be able to reach all corners of ward 3. Nobody has a guarantee of pulling this off and the number running will confuse voters if not maybe turn them off and that is why YOUR NAME may be worth more than where you stand on the issues. No matter what, our race will be overshadowed by the mayor’s race and that will leave us to get our own recognition. On the issue of the early smear campaign between Brooks and Rees, it was reported that smear campaigning is no stranger to Brooks as he did it before when he ran in 2004 and probably is behind or started it in his newest bid for office." ______________ With the exception of a very minor allusion to the campaign, the rest it Mr. Rees's conjecture. The thrust of the news is the school funding issue. There is a huge difference in conjecture and representing that a respected journalist actually reported something. If you and your candidate can't get that, then I am sorry. On the other, where did I ever say I was a woman? Please provide a link, because, like all the other times and places where you allege things about me, this simply has NEVER happened. B. Frank

OK, well here is what WJLA/NewsChannel8 Reported: http://www.wjla.com/news/stories/0106/292363.html Most of the facts as represented on this thread are simply not accurate. Mr. Rees, maybe you need a better group of advisors and media specialists to report to you? B. Frank

Mr. Sherwood, It is truly an honor and pleasure to have you here at the Rees world of insanity. I have long enjoyed your reports on News4 and the NW Current. This is the only place where Mr. Rees and his aliases can be found because he has been banned or limited at just about every other place of note in DC Community Blogs and Listservs (Craigslist and DCist have banned him, yet he continues to attempt to post contrary to list owners wishes and rules for example), Yahoo deleted his DCWARD3 political board, eventhough Mr. Rees claims that he consulted the other candidates who all agreed to use their own resources to reach voters. (Where is Rees's if that is the case?) You will see that our esteemed candidate has a tendancy to exagerate, or worse, simply make up facts as he goes along. Of particular note is his ability to create new "characters" in his world all the time, who are able to "back up" his claims. The humor yesterday, of course is when he asked me what line of work I was in, and one of his alter egos chimed back that my response was vague, and countered with Mr. Rees's background as her own. 'Ooops, what alias am I using today' (says Mr. Rees)...how can I backtrack on this? http://www.dcmessageboards.com/index.php?showtopic=7301 (Note the posts labelled around 10:30 AM -- the server clocks are off). You will also note that a few of us have asked him to share with us facets of his professional and educational background as qualifications for being a councilman. To date, he has failed to provide verifiable acountings of such basic background material. http://www.dcmessageboards.com/index.php?showtopic=7296&st=0 I am sure this person puts you in a tricky position. Any sort of attention gives him credibility, yet voters should know of his antics and potential instability. I am also quite confident that before too long, they will accuse me of posting in your name. Shrug. B. Frank

Well, My friend who is at the General Counsel's office at GlaxoSmithKline says they only deal with the FDA. They deal with states on Medicare issues, but otherwise, you are basically wrong. Is there a reason you are now JRR rather than Jonathan R. Rees? B. Frank

Mr. Rees, My information came from two sources. One at the FDA, the other at the General Counsel's office at GlaxoSmithKline. B. Frank

Very unsuccessful today. Sorry. B. Frank

No. FDA regulates the pharmaceutical industry. States may obviously regulate Pharma companies as corporate entities -- and of course they administer Medicaid, which affects how they do business -- but FDA essentially preempts any regulation related to their business model. Glaxo is HQ'd in Philadelphia. Sad that a layman like me knows more about the industry than a professional. I challange you to show me where in the FDA or legal guidelines there is a requirement for drug approval at the state level. Indeed, that is the whole purpose of the FDA. B. Frank

I was responding to Tammy about where she worked for Glaxo. B. Frank

That seems very pessimistic and defeatist for a politician. B. Frank

Was that at the HQ in Philly? B. Frank

Thats funny, I thought you were a student. Mr. Rees on the other hand preportedly has a career as you just described. Game Set and Match. B. Frank

What do you mean by this? I am an average voter in the Ward. What do you mean by information fed to me. Are you one of those elitist politicians who believes that individuals aren't able to read "position papers" consume media and come to our own conclusions? If the other candidates of Ward 3 race believe that name recognition will be the key to victory, then we need more candidates who believe that issues, moxie and acumen are the key. Oh well. B. Frank

I am a consultant. B. Frank