
Roddy
Veteran-
Posts
25 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Roddy
-
It is one thing to speak your mind but it is another when what you say, you know is not true and you are doing it more to harass than to inform or open up a honest and healthy debate. Mr. Marshall and his girlfriend are not being honest. Unless you have been following the progression of this matter, you will see that Mr. Marshall has gone out of his way to make his presence known in every list server he thinks the candidates are going to. Is that healthy or a sign of someone who has nothing better to do than stir up trouble. Mr. Marshall ignored my request to let us know if he was JT Franks, Frank R, Lucy, Phyllis and the others. I asked him that several times but he never answered and that is because he was those people and trying to be coy and his attacks were more than just expressing an opinion but being outright dishonest and vicious in the process. Tell me, when did any of the candidates post vicious and mean things about anyone?
-
You accused Mr. Rees of slander based upon your not having been at several events whereas the directors of several DC based health care organizations were and heard the same being said. So who are you to presume you have the truth and then go out of your way to call someone a liar which is what you did. Your boss Mr. Daniel Smith has been contacted today and I think others in the health care industry will be doing the same to put a stop to your dishonesty. Unless you were there then never present yourself as having a monopoly on the truth.
-
My boss Dr. Vivens called to the campaign headquaters of Jonathan Rees to let them know what is continuing to go on here, namely, that Mr. Marshall has been stalking Mr. Rees for months on various list servers and Mr. Rees' office contacted Mr. Marshall's boss VP Smith at the American Cancer Society - Government Field Office (202-661-5700) and they were very upset that Mr. Marshall was using their time to have stalked Mr. Rees for so long in various list servers at their expense and using their email system to do it and said this could result in very bad publicity for the American Cancer Society, that they think Mr. Marshall is a supporter or works for Sam Brooks' campaign which might explain his actions and then they had Mr. Marshall's supervisor get on the line and assured all that they would have a serious talk with Mr. Marshall and put a stop to this. I think Mr. Marshall was operating at the behest of SAM BROOKS, he definitely was the screen names of JT Franks, Frank R, Lucy and the others. Let's hope that we have nipped this at the bud and all will go back to the way it was before SAM BROOKS and ERIC MARSHALL began their vicious attacks on an opponent. Kathleen Kravitz Roddy, RN
-
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
From what I saw, your girlfriend responded to a blind ad on Craig's List which Harry posted to lure SAM in and she responded to that blind ad in angry manner. She did not respond to a published name. What was her reason to respond to such a blind ad? Is it that you and her spend most of your days cruising the web. Contrary to what you say, I believe that you are either SAM or working for him as nobody would spend as much time on the web as you do, for the many months you have and focus on attacking someone. Also you never answered the question are you JT Frank or FRANK R as you have avoided this question for over an hour. I believe you are all of these people. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
This is a start. However, the e-mail that Shannon sent only went to an e-mail that was setup by somebody who was obviously Sam Brooks, but isn't. The only place that e-mail was sent was to that specific address. So, the angry e-mails that were sent to Shannon accusing her of being Sam could only have been sent by people who have access to the fake Sam Brooks e-mail. Also, according to your original statement that I have quoted here tirelessly you took repsonsibility for having friends e-mail Shannon. One of the people who e-mailed Shannon was Harry Firestone. So, how did you only hear about this from a bcc from Harry Firestone, when you've already claimed that you had HIM send the e-mails? Who did your girlfriend send her email to originally? -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
I didn't. I got a blind copy of an email to Shannon from my work associate Harry. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
Is anybody denying that they are members of other servers? No I don't see them doing it but the truth is, you are online most of the day posting under different names and the fact you have been online for 90 minutes battling out with me instead of working is good as this is going to be faxed to the ACS so they can see that at their expense you are using their time to engage in political battles on the net. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
From: "Eric Marshall" <mshall77@...> Date: Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:37 am Subject: Re: Why do I like to stalk people Offline Send Email DC Pages Look how easy I can fool all of you into believing what I am say and how easy it is to edit and change names to make it look like something was said or done. HEY PEOPLE LOOK ABOVE. THIS IS HOW EASY IT IS FOR SAM OR ERIC TO DECEIVE YOU INTO BELIEVING SOMEONE ACTUALLY WROTE SOMETHING. I admit I edited thre above to make a point. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
Once again, you are posting matters that nobody can verify is true or was in fact posted by who you claim did such. I am trying to get you to answer why is is so important to stalk. Nobody has stalked for many long months as you have. You need to explain to everyone why you feel the need to go around the web all day long stalking, posting and so on unless you are in fact SAM BROOKS or work for him as no normal person would do this who is busy trying to earn a living. How can you do your job when you are seen posting hour after hour and day after day. THERE IS SOMETHING TERRIBLY ABNORMAL IN WHAT YOU ARE DOING. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy posted a topic in District of Columbia Politics
Eric, Frank or whatever your real name is, by you and others constantly attacking and attacking leaving nobody to know for sure who is who is very immature, it is causing hostilities and offers no redeeming value. Why not just end it all and maybe those who support Rees will back off as I am at it because of I am tired of it from both sides. You go away and I am sure the problem will go away and we can all sit back and watch a better breast for tat between Cropp and Fenty. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
That is how I know those screen names. They were e-mailed to my fiancee. I did not get them from Craigs List. Everything is laid out in this thread and you still can't keep your story straight. As I stated before. The name Nicole Dixon was never emailed to your girlfiend but to SAM BROOKS at his hotmail account under SFBm. NOW YOU FINALLY PROVED YOU ARE SAM BROOKS OR WORKING UNDER HIM. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
The gig is up Rees. I never said that in the Tenleytown listserv. I actually said it in an IM conversation with Jon Rees after I made a post on the Tenleytown listserv. OK, now follow the bouncing ball. Here's the post on the Tenleytown list, and then directly below it is an IM that Jon Rees sent to me right afterwards. From: Eric.Marshall@cancer.org Date: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:34 pm Subject: Please stop with the slander Mshall77 Send IM Send Email Mr. Rees, it would behoove you not to post slanderous material on a community listserv. I don't think anybody on this list believes that you heard Chairman Cropp, Councilmember Fenty, Councilmember Evans, or Councilmember Catania say that. Please sir, convince people to vote for you by stating your positions on the issues, not by slandering somebody who you have already stated on this very list isn't running for her Ward 3 seat again. jrrees1955: You need to know your fact before you show your rear end. jrrees1955: Patterson was suppose to co-chair the debate with Catania and never showed up and this had the others in the corner stewed and saying what they did so Cantania hosted it alone. mshall77: she was supposed to co-chair a Ward 5 Democrats meeting? mshall77: interesting jrrees1955: According to Mr. Bobb the debate was to be co-chaired by her and Catania. mshall77: and Robert Bobb runs to Ward 5 Democrats? that's news to me There's a lot of back and forth in which Rees' story changes here, so I'll skip ahead to the nail in the coffin. jrrees1955: What Ward do you live in? mshall77: 6 jrrees1955: That is where? mshall77: u don't know where Ward 6 is? jrrees1955: I think the Hill mshall77: wow mshall77: and you want to be a DC Councilmember? jrrees1955: I am tired today. mshall77: u might want to put that on your list of things to learn What you posted is not how any email would look in its true format. This is a pathetic attempt to justify what you are doing. Everybody, go and look at how the headings are in an email from other, then your response and an ongoing conversation. Good try but you are not fooling people as what you posted is not a bonafide email exchange. What is your problem? Mr. Rees is a very influential person in the health care industry, he has the ears of the presidents of the various hospitals, many organizations and I am sure if he wanted to, he could cause you to lose your job. So why are messing with him. You are a sick puppy and why don't you sahre with others how long a venture this has been by you to attack Mr. Rees and you previously stated reason says you are sick amn that you ahev to stalk people indefinitely on the internet and I will stand behind what I said, you were cuising the gay dating section of the CL last night and I got my friend to post an an ad to lure you in and you confused screen anmes. YOU AVOIDED MY QUESTION. ARE YOU THIS PERSON JT FRANK, FRANK R or LUCY, PHYLLIS which were names used in 2002 to attack Harold Brazil and Kwame Brown and then Rees now as I worked on Kwame Brown's campaign and those screen names I will never forget or will you cliam it is somebody else. How do we know you are not playing good cop/bad cop and is the person behind all these names? Will you deny that you have been stalking others on the net even using this current name. This time don't ignore the question. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
The gig is up Rees. I never said that in the Tenleytown listserv. I actually said it in an IM conversation with Jon Rees after I made a post on the Tenleytown listserv. OK, now follow the bouncing ball. Here's the post on the Tenleytown list, and then directly below it is an IM that Jon Rees sent to me right afterwards. From: Eric.Marshall@cancer.org Date: Fri Sep 30, 2005 1:34 pm Subject: Please stop with the slander Mshall77 Send IM Send Email Mr. Rees, it would behoove you not to post slanderous material on a community listserv. I don't think anybody on this list believes that you heard Chairman Cropp, Councilmember Fenty, Councilmember Evans, or Councilmember Catania say that. Please sir, convince people to vote for you by stating your positions on the issues, not by slandering somebody who you have already stated on this very list isn't running for her Ward 3 seat again. jrrees1955: You need to know your fact before you show your rear end. jrrees1955: Patterson was suppose to co-chair the debate with Catania and never showed up and this had the others in the corner stewed and saying what they did so Cantania hosted it alone. mshall77: she was supposed to co-chair a Ward 5 Democrats meeting? mshall77: interesting jrrees1955: According to Mr. Bobb the debate was to be co-chaired by her and Catania. mshall77: and Robert Bobb runs to Ward 5 Democrats? that's news to me There's a lot of back and forth in which Rees' story changes here, so I'll skip ahead to the nail in the coffin. jrrees1955: What Ward do you live in? mshall77: 6 jrrees1955: That is where? mshall77: u don't know where Ward 6 is? jrrees1955: I think the Hill mshall77: wow mshall77: and you want to be a DC Councilmember? jrrees1955: I am tired today. mshall77: u might want to put that on your list of things to learn What you posted is not how any email would look in its true format. This is a pathetic attempt to justify what you are doing. Everybody, go and look at how the headings are in an email from other, then your response and an ongoing conversation. Good try but you are not fooling people as what you posted is not a bonafide email exchange. What is your problem? Mr. Rees is a very influential person in the health care industry, he has the ears of the presidents of the various hospitals, many organizations and I am sure if he wanted to, he could cause you to lose your job. So why are messing with him. You are a sick puppy and why don't you sahre with others how long a venture this has been by you to attack Mr. Rees and you previously stated reason says you are sick amn that you ahev to stalk people indefinitely on the internet and I will stand behind what I said, you were cuising the gay dating section of the CL last night and I got my friend to post an an ad to lure you in and you confused screen anmes. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
So would you deny that you are the person who has been posting here under the names of JT Frank, Frank R and the like? One of these names you mentioned above would have only been known to you from last night if you had been in one of Craig's List GAY DATING ROOMS and you say that you have this beautiful griendfriend? I won't go there but if the shoe fits does she know? -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
I notice that in the Tenleytown list server, you stated that you were a resident of Ward 6, that you live on The Hill but there is no Eric Marshall registered with the BOEE in Ward 6. You have proven nothing other than you have no reason to be involving yourself in Ward 3 matters. The best thing you can do is stop and maybe everybody else will too. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
The American Cancer Society DC office said they do not recognize your name as an employee, field representative or the like but asked to see all the postings you have done in the various list servers because they said some employees do not use their actual name for their email address. Also, the ACS allows email addresses as a favor to contributors so the fact you claim to have one is no proof as you are who I say you are and are being coy. JUST GO AWAY and let this server have health conversations as I notice on the other list servers as far back at two months ago you were attacking people under a similar name. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
Shannon Hughs in my fiancee. I met her when we both worked on a House of Delegates race in Northern Virginia for Mark Sickles (who defeated a two-term incumbent by the way). We then left Virginia and both worked on the primary for John Kerry in New Hampshire. You can see our names here in the Manchester field office for Shannon and the Portsmouth field office for me.http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/kerry/kerrorgnh.html After New Hampshire, we both returned to Washington, DC where Shannon works at Strother Duffy Shelton, a political consulting firm. You can check out her bio here, isn't she beautiful?http://www.strotherduffystrother.com/who/s...nnon_hughs.html. I now work for the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network as the Field Representative for it's smoke-free campaign for D.C. Check out our campaign website, you'll see that my name is everywhere on it. http://www.breatheeasydc.org/ So, once again, I do not live in Ward 3, and do not have a stake in who gets elected to fill the seat being vacated by Kathy Patterson. I am simply disgusted by this slanderous character assasination and could not stand idly by without saying something. Thank you, Eric Marshall (once again, I do exist) Guess what, all your harassing emails and postings have been faxed over with a cover letter to Ms. Breckenridge who is the Director of the American Cancer Society showing that during normal work hours you under this name have been harassing. I have spoken to the president of my hospital and he will seek to also speak to Ms. Breckenridge. -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to Roddy's topic in District of Columbia Politics
Memory lane wasn't that long ago. In fact, it was 2004, not 2002. I mean, if you're going to commit libel, at least get ONE of your facts right. You are obviously Jon Rees. Everybody knows that. This same crap has been pulled all over the listservs. Tenleytown, Palisades, Gloverpark, and Cleveland Park. All with the same results. Everybody gets frustrated, totally calls you on the fact that it is you making up fake screen names, and then you attack them, not only through the listserv, but also through personal e-mail. I fully expect my inbox to now be filled with swear-filled, insulting e-mails from Harry Firestone, Giovanni Lechesi, Nichole Sherry Dixxon, Alex Biddy, and even maybe THE Jon Rees himself. I do not live in Ward 3, and do not have a stake in who gets elected to fill the seat being vacated by Kathy Patterson. The field hasn't even been settled yet. Hey, you never know, maybe Jon Rees actually DOES have some sort of coherent policy plan that I might agree with. So, do not misread this as some supportive e-mail for a Sam Brooks, Nancy MacWood or anybody else who may run, or an attack against Jon Rees, because it is not. It's just a simple call to cease in desist with this ridiculous method of campaign that Jon Rees has employed. Nobody is going to vote for you because you make up screen names and then slander people. Nobody is going to mistake you for Karl Rove or James Carville. People are going to vote for you if you come up with sound policy statements, and solutions to the problems that Ward 3 voters face. They will vote for you if you prove to them that you have the experience, personality, balance, and will to be an effective member of the D.C. Council. So, instead of spending your time with these fake screen names, develop some sound policies, raise money, print up some walk cards, and go door to door. Talk to voters, find out what their concerns are, and stop this senseless charade. Thank you, Eric Marshall (I promise you I exist) Sam Brooks...you have been set up. First off, I am who I say I am and you can check out my profile at http://profiles.yahoo.com/kathleenroddy. Second, those other screen names you just stated never appeared in any list server but I had friends last night email you at your phony screen name shannon.hughes@gmail.com and this day you finally exposed yourself Sam because how would you have know those names who emailed Shannon last night unless you are Shannon? GOT YOU NOW SAM BROOKS. You just proved my point. And no, I am not associated with any candidate but just one of many people tired of you running around the web attacking people indiscriminately. YOU HAVE BEEN CAUGHT SAM........! -
The Washington Post Just Said No To Sam Brooks
Roddy posted a topic in District of Columbia Politics
THE WASHINGTON POST Saturday, September 11, 2004; Page A20 The District deserves a better choice for city council than Sam Brooks. Sam Brooks doesn’t come anywhere close in the needed experience overall in representing the city. He is long on energy and ambition but short on community service, and lacks substantive knowledge of the problems confronting the city and ideas for solving them. The council does not need Sam Brooks but someone who knows how the government works, is familiar with the city other than through a political door-to-door campaign and who doesn't need on-the-job training in the basics. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If all of us goes down memory lane to the 2002 at large council race, there was some very ugly postings on the internet attacking Harold Brazil and Kwame Brown originating from screen names similar with the FRANK name in it and in the upcoming 2006 ward three race, the same kind of attacks came out against Rees with the same but this time under the screen names JT Frank and Frank R. Who had a reason back in 2002 to viciously attack Harold Brazil and Kwame Brown and in 2005 Jonathan Rees with identical screen names in many forums? Right Sam Brooks. Out of fairness, DC Pages should see the reality that Sam Brooks does not come before the voters and present what he has to offer but to repeat what he did in 2002 thinking smearing people is the way to win an election. -
I think the people of Ward 3 want to hear from all candidates to our city council. I heard from Nancy MacWood who said she might run, I am not impressed with her and the fact that she appears late often at her own ANC meetings, she is abusive and obnoxious to others and I would not vote for her. I heard from Jonathan Rees, saw his website, seen his campaign literature all over the ward and I am impressed with him. Now I want to hear what Sam Brooks has to say and offer before I decide who to vote for next year. This is what the people want to hear and see not these attacks!
-
Please Read This Message From Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to sambrooks's topic in District of Columbia Politics
Luke, The public record shows that Sam Brooks holds himself out as having owned or still owns an internet business, he has boasted as to his computer skills and to some how easy it is to appear online as anyone you want to be. I just think everybody needs to start being nice and that will end it all. -
I find what Mr. Brooks to be saying highly dishonest as I believe that he was the person behind different screen names attacking others. If you look at the writing style, it strongly resembles that of others here known as JT Frank, Frank R, Lucy, Phyllis and others. Mr. Brooks, you might believe that you are fooling others but not me as you pulled this same crap back in 2002 by attacking Harold Brazil and also shooting yourself in the foot to make it look like somebody else to get sympathy. I am one voter who is not buying your innocence and you and your many screen names needs to go away!
-
Please Read This Message From Sam Brooks
Roddy replied to sambrooks's topic in District of Columbia Politics
I find what Mr. Brooks to be saying as highly dishonest as I believe that he was the person behind different screen names attacking others. If you look at the writing style, it strongly resembles that of others here known as JT Frank, Frank R, Lucy, Phyllis and others. Mr. Brooks, you might believe that you are fooling others but not me as you pulled this same crap back in 2002 by attacking Harold Brazil and also shooting youself in the foot to make it look like somebody else to get sympathy. I am one voter who is not buying your innocence and you and your many screen names needs to go away! -
Dc Deserves Better Than Kathy Patterson.....!
Roddy replied to a topic in District of Columbia Politics
I think this JT Frank which I doubt is his real name should explain to us why he has gone from list server to another hunting down Rees, attacking him with unfounded claims and state what is his reason for wanting to annoy all of us, make us think Rees' campaign is over when it is clearl thriving and I'd bet there is some personal hatred for Rees stemming either from something in the past or he is being asked to do it by someone wanting to run against Rees as there is no logic. JT Frank please explain to all of us.