Ladies and Gentlemen,
Your interpretation of the Hatch Act is very defective.
Where they are going to pop Ms. Gordon is based on the fact that paid or not, she is an elected official.
Elected officials can work on political campaigns of other candidates as a volunteer.
Elected officials may not accept an official position on another candidates’ campaign, participate in the fundraising or allow their name and official title to be used to obtain contributions or influence votes.
Where these people are going to prevail in getting Ms. Gordon charged and prosecuted is that she should never have accepted the chairmanship of Mr. Brooks campaign and allowed her name and title to be used. As chairman, she is by law seen as the one who heads up and is responsible for all aspects of the campaign operations. (This is where she will get popped hard).
This is why the DC Attorney General found that there has been a violation and recommended that the Office of Special Counsel open a case and they did.
Ask any attorney and he or she will tell you that whoever did this to Ms. Gordon played it really smart and knew what they were doing.
I guess since everybody in here has been playing games, most of you were going after your target with PEA SHOOTERS but the other side hit Ms. Gordon in the azz with a CRUISE MISSLE!