The following was posted on a national board for the elderly here in DC by Jonathan Rees
---------------------------
No matter how much money you have in your campaign war chest, it does no good if it is not spent correctly.
I looked carefully at the campaign finances of my chief protagonist Sam Brooks and this is what I found.
Sam Brooks is currently unemployed and is renting an apartment to live in and uses it as his campaign headquarters.
Despite the fact that he claims he has received $28k in campaign contributions, most of this will be going to pay the rent and incidentals on that apartment, his food and other essentials. If this figure remains constant, then about $20k of this amount will be directed to Brooks and his own upkeep between now and September 2006. This leaves $8k to pay his chair, treasurer and put to actual campaign promotions.
My point here is, campaign contributions are meant to go for promoting a campaign not to be used by a candidate to pay her/his rent food and other personal things but our campaign finance laws are too loosely written.
I am proud to say that 100% of my money has gone into campaign literature and my staff is made up of volunteers. This is what a campaign is all about.
I am sure that all of my other rivals are running a very honest campaign because they are mature adults who are in it for the people they want to represent and not to feed their own mouths or egos.
Also if this is any consolation, less than $1k of the money Brooks received came from contributors in Ward 3 (His own chair gave him $500). Most of it came from outside of DC and the DuPont Circle and Capitol Hill areas of DC but very little of it.
To me, using campaign contributions for your own support of rent, utilities and food is dishonest.