dice

WOW...it took you 8 long hours to create a really good bold face lie which you have no independent proof of unless you work for DC Message Board. The fact that JRR may have registered is no proof it was he who registered nor is it proof it is him. It could be you registering in his name. Sorry you have to do better as you might fool the average Joe Blow but you are so wrong.

Nowhere tonight is DC Message Board posting any IP addresses and thus the fact that you respond as we clock it within 18 seconds of our posting with all IP addresses lends itself to a very valid claim that someone inside DC Message Board is involved in this sham as no outsider could see and respond as fast as an insider. You see people when they log in, you see their IP address, you wait for them to post and then zippity doo you fire back. Only someone inside DC Pages could move that fast. Furthermore, you are listed not as holding a membership with DC Message Board. Slowly but surely you are giving yourselves away although it took time to narrow it down. Now tell me our IP address but I can assure you I am not a Rees alias so you will have to do better.

Now Now Now, you know that Martin Austermuhle and Luke Wilbur are not going to be able to leave their offices to meet with you and Rees. My God, who will then run DCist and DC Message Boards?

No Bfrank (Martin Austermuhle/Sam Brooks & Company) there is not yet a link to them but Rees will distribute them at any public forum that Brooks attends and will use them when and where needed.

The notably email newsletter DC WATCH has announced that a few people attempting to post alias complaints against Jonathan Rees will be denied unless they give their real name, address, phone number and email address. DC Watch has now in its possessions photographs taken of SAM BROOKS tearing down political posters of Jonathan Rees at the intersection of Connecticut Avenue NW and Tilden Street NW. We stung Sam Brooks by putting up Rees posters, laid in wait and when he came around near his home and saw the posters, he proceed to tear them down and we snapped photos of him doing it. Now Rees has the ultimate weapon to prove that SAM BROOKS has been doing wrong and will present these photographs in public forums to show that it was SAM BROOKS who started the smear campaign!

Brooks and his allies post different things every day on about 20 different message boards but when they post, they post the same message but use a different screen name to do it. The names are many but usually they come under B Frank, Frank B, JT Frank, District Information, Truthseeker, Factchecker2, Joe Kerr, Joe Deluth, Jacqueline, avoterinward3, joycemarie20008 and more. This is sad but a fact and Brooks and his crew are very good at lying and trying to convince others you are doing the same. -- In ward3dc@yahoogroups.com, "lg_loomis" <lg_loomis@y...> wrote: Below is proof that Jaqueline forgot that she posted the same thing on three boards but used three different screen names. This is how Sam Brooks & Company works. They post the same thing all over the internet but use different names to do it. I REST MY CASE! From: "avoterinward3" <avoterinward3@> Date: Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:49 pm Subject: Jonathan Rees says he's been snooping on voters' For anyone who's following the Ward 3 City Council race, and especially Jonathan Rees' candidacy, I thought I would forward this message which appeared on the Ward3DC Yahoo, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ward3dc ------------------------------------------------------------ From: "Jacqueline" <guitare24jacqueline@> Date: Sun Jan 13, 2006 10:59 pm Subject: Jonathan Rees says he's been snooping on voters' For anyone who's following the Ward 3 City Council race, and especially Jonathan Rees' candidacy, I thought I would forward this message which appeared on the Ward3DC Yahoo, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ward3dc ------------------------------------------------------------ From: joycemarie20008 Date: Fri Jan 13, 2006 5:32 pm Subject: Jonathan Rees says he's been snooping on voters' For anyone who's following the Ward 3 City Council race, and especially Jonathan Rees' candidacy, I thought I would forward this message which appeared on the Ward3DC Yahoo, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ward3dc --- End forwarded message ---

That is why he spend so much time here on the internet under a long string of aliases trying to win through a smear campaign because he cannot match Rees, his man power or brain power. So since Brooks is a loser and lost bad last time round, he is again making the same mistakes he did in 2004. If Brooks was not intimidated by Rees then he would go away and have a real campaign and be out on the streets now like the other three active candidates are. Brooks fingerprint is everywhere on all that is rotten even if he is getting the help of others who are on the net taking turns.

Let me say again. You are stupid. People who run for public office cannot sue anyone for what is said about them but anything a candidate says about you, you cannot sue him. Did you not know that you knucklehead!

The following was emailed early today to 6,000 voters in ward 3 and placed on numerous blogs: Back in August 2005 when I announced my candidacy by placing announcements on various blogs, message boards and the like, I started being attacked with some very vicious allegations that I was an ex-convict with a record of pedophilia, spousal abuse and more. I did not know who was doing it. I hired an IT guy out of Springfield, Virginia to help track down the culprit and he did. We discovered that despite the various screen names, the IP ADDRESS were all the same as the IP ADDRESS belonging to SAM BROOKS. I was then informed that when SAM BROOKS ran for office previously, there was a lesser smear campaign launched by SAM BROOKS against Kwame Brown and Harold Brazil. Since BROOKS became aware that we had discovered his little game, he has not stopped with his efforts to smear me and continues it day in and day out but now hides his IP ADDRESS behind a proxy address and he uses a long string of various screen names. About two months ago in order to get some media attention; Brooks began a smear campaign against himself to make it look like someone was calling him a racist. He then took that lie to the Washington Post, Washington Blade and Washington Examiner knowing he was lying to them. They all gave him a small story. My concern is, since there is a record of BROOKS smearing his rivals in past efforts and now me, I wonder what he might have in store for other candidates that are soon to enter the race once they erect a web page and go full blast with their campaigns. BROOKS continues to demand a debate and when I keep on refusing it, the very same day I refuse, the attacks on me intensify with allegations that I am not a real candidate, that I am obstructing real candidates to enter the race and I am denying voters a chance to hear the candidates on the issues. SAM BROOKS\' campaign manager is ANC Commissioner Tamela Gordon but I do not think she is aware of what he is doing. Of recent, SAM BROOKS is getting help in his smear campaign from one of his former lovers Martin Austermuhle who is a writer for the blog known as DCist. Austermuhle has always given Brooks coverage on his blog but never offered it to Brazil, Brown and etcetera. Three nights ago, it was placed all over the internet that SAM BROOKS & COMPANY was behind the smear campaign and it was very detailed. As a result of this, two blogs shut down and all went running to delete all postings that might have been placed by BROOKS and the some 27 alias names he has used, his partner in crime Martin Austermuhle has panicked and become very silent. The only reason I bring this to your attention is, I think the candidates want a clean campaign but based upon what I have experienced to date, BROOKS so far in his short political career does not want that and has smeared every rival he has faced. I believe that if we do not entertain him, he will become very upset and the attacks will continue but he does this to get attention and name recognition. If you look at his website, he claims that he has already gotten over $12k in campaign contributions which I believe is untrue unless it is his own money or was given to him by his family. LOOSE LIPS of the Washington City Paper has a problem with BROOKS in that BROOKS may not in truth live in Ward 3 and more. In sum, this is sad what he is doing and I hope all other candidates do not become his next target and that we not give him what he wants so badly and that is, a series of debates where Martin Austermuhle has offered to sponsor such along with other allies of BROOKS. Sincerely, Jonathan R. Rees

What you claim is a bold face lie. You cannot offer the readers any independent and verifiable proof that what you say has any truth to it but when I make an allegation, I will give the readers the ability to obtain independent and verifiable proof. Bite me fool! You can’t fight what I will be coming with Sam Brooks & Company.

It means that Brooks & Company has to date and counting 27 different screen names and some of these names he used in 2004 when engaging in a smear campaign against former political adversaries.

Rees was not snooping on anyone but like all other political candidates, he was referencing lists that were provide to him by these bodies which are available to any citizen that asks.

You are a liar and have just made up that claim. Yet, anybody who goes to the DC Office of Campaign Finance at the Reeves Center can get proof that what Rees posted is true.

SAMUEL A.C. BROOKS & DCIST MARTIN AUSTERMUHLE WERE FORMER GAY LOVERS. The blog known as DCist is a very biased blog. If you check the archives of DCist, you will find a few stories and/or interviews of Samuel A.C. Brooks but you will find no such stories or interviews of anybody who ran against Brooks. Why? Because his former gay lover Martin Austermuhle who controls DCist would not allow anyone running against his former lover to get any of his media coverage and anyone who appeared to pose as a threat, would be attacked by Austermuhle. Do not take my word for this. Go check the archives of DCist and learn the truth for yourself.

The DC PAGES message board on politics is hilarious especially the never ending war of words between the evil forces of Martin Austermuhle and Jonathan Rees. Unless people are out of touch with reality, these postings attempting to besmirch this guy Rees is clearly being posted by an opponent or someone working for that opponent and/or a strong supporter and we the voters are not as dumb as the poster thinks we might be. Contrary to all the allegations going back and forth as to who is who, I am quite in tune with most message boards and blogs and the writings of this Bfrank and others is almost picture perfect identical to that of blogger Martin Austermuhle who works for this blog known as (DCist). I would bet my last dime he is the person behind the screen names of Bfrank and others as the writing style and aggressive tactics is so him. Of course Martin, you are probably going to fire back and accuse me of being someone in cahoots with this Rees guy but I am not, but I have watched you post things against him in many forums. So when we put the pieces together, we have a picture of Martin Austermuhle possibly behind the person posting these angry remarks about Rees Now who is this guy posting as Rees and others? Well, there are fewer similarities in the writings and it looks like three different people are doing it. Rees has been posting elsewhere where you do not go, telling people you began hating him when he dared to post claims that the majority of gay voters in DC did not cast their vote for some guy named Brooks, you became very aggressive and angry over it because you are a homosexual and you were offended by a non-homosexual daring to say how the gay community did or did not vote. You became obsessively fanatical in your demand that Rees retract the claim. Is this not true? Rees somehow offended you by making a claim about the voting habits of the gay community and you went on this rampage against him and have never stopped. What you did Martin Austermuhle is so obvious. Today you accused Rees of posting things, he said he did not and he asked you to bet him $500 over whether or not he did and offered to take you somewhere before some very honest people who could tell you Rees could not have done such. Did you accept the offer from Rees? No you did not! Instead, you became instant chicken ***brown trout*** because Rees called you to the mat, you knew he could make you look like the complete jackass that you are and since you are not a man, you just totally backed off and went away. What were you afraid of Martin Austermuhle? Afraid that Rees would make a fool of you and all the stupid and hateful postings you have been placing over on DC Pages and elsewhere? I think Rees is still waiting for you to accept the $500 bid that he can prove he did none of these postings you accused him of. Martin Austermuhle, you have, for months allowed your anger to cloud your judgment and set yourself up to look like a fool. I will end this rant by saying, all the education you have achieved was a waste because you let your anger cause you to be stupid. Blog on fool.