The United States Office of Special Counsel,

[Psycho Voter]

The United States Office of Special Counsel will shortly establish for Mr. Sam Brooks and Ms. Tamela Gordon who we are and they will realize at that time, we have no relationship with this guy Rees but a ghost of Brooks Past.

 

Mr. Brooks has a history of wanting to smear his opponents just as he did when he ran for public office before and lost.

 

All of us were just waiting for him to rear his ugly head again and he did and we went into action.

 

Yesterday, a group of people came together to file with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel a (complaint) against his campaign chair for violating the HATCH ACT after the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia saw the facts and concluded there was a violation and instructed us to file. Ms. Tamela Gordon saw that written opinion from the DC OAG.

 

Brooks to cover up his F-up quickly removed all mention on his website the name and endorsement of his campaign chair who is a curret DC government official but not fast enough for us to be able to freeze the flash point presentation and print it out which is attached to our complaint.

 

The evidence of the HATCH ACT violation is a lot stronger than just that.

 

No sooner than we popped the punk doggess he scrambles to seek peace with his rivals by asking them to sign a pledge which you can find on his website but who is he kidding. A clean campaign? That punk doggess does not know the meaning of a clean campaign.

 

All of you crackers should put on your white sheets and come on out of the dark because nobody is being fooled.

[truthseeker]

To the reporters and voters reading the post below. Please note that "Psycho Voter" is posting from an IP address that has been used over 50 times, under the aliases JRR (who previously identified himself as Rees), Nikkidix, Ms. Glover Park, Perry Mason and John Q. Public.

 

Your critics have proven, via commonly recognized conventions of internet posting, who YOU are. You have yet to post a single link, screenshot or other documentation showing that anything you've posted below is true. It's more of the same ugly, empty blather that we've come to expect/dread.

 

 

 

The United States Office of Special Counsel will shortly establish for Mr. Sam Brooks and Ms. Tamela Gordon who we are and they will realize at that time, we have no relationship with this guy Rees but a ghost of Brooks Past.

 

Mr. Brooks has a history of wanting to smear his opponents just as he did when he ran for public office before and lost.

 

All of us were just waiting for him to rear his ugly head again and he did and we went into action.

 

Yesterday, a group of people came together to file with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel a (complaint) against his campaign chair for violating the HATCH ACT after the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia saw the facts and concluded there was a violation and instructed us to file. Ms. Tamela Gordon saw that written opinion from the DC OAG.

 

Brooks to cover up his F-up quickly removed all mention on his website the name and endorsement of his campaign chair who is a curret DC government official but not fast enough for us to be able to freeze the flash point presentation and print it out which is attached to our complaint.

 

The evidence of the HATCH ACT violation is a lot stronger than just that.

 

No sooner than we popped the punk doggess he scrambles to seek peace with his rivals by asking them to sign a pledge which you can find on his website but who is he kidding. A clean campaign? That punk doggess does not know the meaning of a clean campaign.

 

All of you crackers should put on your white sheets and come on out of the dark because nobody is being fooled.

[bfrankdc]

For anyone interested, here is the link to the definitions for the Hatch Act:

 

http://www.osc.gov/ha_fed.htm

 

I am curious as to when being an ANC Commissioner became a paid position, much less one funded by the Federal Government.

 

So does this mean that Robert Gordon (whom "John Q. Public" supports -- the same John Q Public who posted fropm the same IP address as the originator of this thread) is also in violation because of his support from Jerry Levine? What about Concilman Kwame Brown, who is working on the Cropp for Mayor campaign? I wonder when the rants against those candidates will start?

 

I should also add that the prospect of an MPD Officer working on the Rees campaign would actually be a violation of the Hatch Act, if that were true. However, since the IP Address and syntax of "DC Police Officer Magana" match a certain Ward 3 candidate, I think that the impersonation of a Police Officer is the more appropriate violation.

 

B. Frank

Edited February 8, 2006 by bfrankdc

[truthseeker]

My guess is he never even heard of it until it mentioned in connection with the "Officer Magana" posting. Obviously he doesn't understand what the Hatch Act is. Embarassing.

 

 

As always, I encourage new readers/reporters here to read the IP list at the top of this forum before entertaining any of the weird claims by the constant parade of new posters here.

 

 

 

For anyone interested, here is the link to the definitions for the Hatch Act:

 

http://www.osc.gov/ha_fed.htm

 

I am curious as to when being an ANC Commissioner became a paid position, much less one funded by the Federal Government.

 

So does this mean that Robert Gordon (whom "John Q. Public" supports -- the same John Q Public who posted fropm the same IP address as the originator of this thread) is also in violation because of his support from Jerry Levine? What about Concilman Kwame Brown, who is working on the Cropp for Mayor campaign? I wonder when the rants against those candidates will start?

 

I should also add that the prospect of an MPD Officer working on the Rees campaign would actually be a violation of the Hatch Act, if that were true. However, since the IP Address and syntax of "DC Police Officer Magana" match a certain Ward 3 candidate, I think that the impersonation of a Police Officer is the more appropriate violation.

 

B. Frank

Edited February 8, 2006 by truthseeker

[Undertaker]

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

Your interpretation of the Hatch Act is very defective.

 

Where they are going to pop Ms. Gordon is based on the fact that paid or not, she is an elected official.

 

Elected officials can work on political campaigns of other candidates as a volunteer.

 

Elected officials may not accept an official position on another candidates’ campaign, participate in the fundraising or allow their name and official title to be used to obtain contributions or influence votes.

 

Where these people are going to prevail in getting Ms. Gordon charged and prosecuted is that she should never have accepted the chairmanship of Mr. Brooks campaign and allowed her name and title to be used. As chairman, she is by law seen as the one who heads up and is responsible for all aspects of the campaign operations. (This is where she will get popped hard).

 

This is why the DC Attorney General found that there has been a violation and recommended that the Office of Special Counsel open a case and they did.

 

Ask any attorney and he or she will tell you that whoever did this to Ms. Gordon played it really smart and knew what they were doing.

 

I guess since everybody in here has been playing games, most of you were going after your target with PEA SHOOTERS but the other side hit Ms. Gordon in the azz with a CRUISE MISSLE!

[bfrankdc]

Wow, another reasoned post from the same IP used several times by "Andrew Dice Clay" and "missgloverpark".

 

207.69.137.201

 

B. Frank

 

 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

Your interpretation of the Hatch Act is very defective.

 

Where they are going to pop Ms. Gordon is based on the fact that paid or not, she is an elected official.

 

Elected officials can work on political campaigns of other candidates as a volunteer.

 

Elected officials may not accept an official position on another candidates’ campaign, participate in the fundraising or allow their name and official title to be used to obtain contributions or influence votes.

 

Where these people are going to prevail in getting Ms. Gordon charged and prosecuted is that she should never have accepted the chairmanship of Mr. Brooks campaign and allowed her name and title to be used. As chairman, she is by law seen as the one who heads up and is responsible for all aspects of the campaign operations. (This is where she will get popped hard).

 

This is why the DC Attorney General found that there has been a violation and recommended that the Office of Special Counsel open a case and they did.

 

Ask any attorney and he or she will tell you that whoever did this to Ms. Gordon played it really smart and knew what they were doing.

 

I guess since everybody in here has been playing games, most of you were going after your target with PEA SHOOTERS but the other side hit Ms. Gordon in the azz with a CRUISE MISSLE!

[goldengirl]

Sure Rees, you played it real smart...were you thinking the same thing when you did this?

 

 

Jonathan Rees' attempt to solicit sex take 1:

 

http://forums.washingtondc.craigslist.org/?ID=25967295

 

Jonathan Rees' attempt to solicit sex take 2:

 

Received: by 10.11.1.23 with SMTP id 23mr161921cwa; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:26:49 -0800 (PST)

Received: from 4.249.111.100 by f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com with HTTP;

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:26:49 +0000 (UTC)

From: jrrees@peoplepc.com

To: "Discrete affairs in Washington DC area" <Discrete-affairs-in-Washington-DC-area@googlegroups.com>

Subject: ITALIAN MAN 40 ISO WM FOR KINKY SEX

Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:26:49 -0000

Message-ID: <1132975609.493196.246950@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

User-Agent: G2/0.2

X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; PeoplePal 3.0; InfoPath.1; PeoplePal 6.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

 

MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

If you a kinky lady and would like to meet a hot Italian guy then let's

chat.

 

Most of you have seen it before, it's an oldie, but a goodie

 

PS..by your logic should we pursue a Hatch Act violation for Mayor Williams' recent fundraiser for Kathy Patterson?

 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

Your interpretation of the Hatch Act is very defective.

 

Where they are going to pop Ms. Gordon is based on the fact that paid or not, she is an elected official.

 

Elected officials can work on political campaigns of other candidates as a volunteer.

 

Elected officials may not accept an official position on another candidates’ campaign, participate in the fundraising or allow their name and official title to be used to obtain contributions or influence votes.

 

Where these people are going to prevail in getting Ms. Gordon charged and prosecuted is that she should never have accepted the chairmanship of Mr. Brooks campaign and allowed her name and title to be used. As chairman, she is by law seen as the one who heads up and is responsible for all aspects of the campaign operations. (This is where she will get popped hard).

 

This is why the DC Attorney General found that there has been a violation and recommended that the Office of Special Counsel open a case and they did.

 

Ask any attorney and he or she will tell you that whoever did this to Ms. Gordon played it really smart and knew what they were doing.

 

I guess since everybody in here has been playing games, most of you were going after your target with PEA SHOOTERS but the other side hit Ms. Gordon in the azz with a CRUISE MISSLE!

[bfrankdc]

When reading the linked article, please know that "roque20009" and "Thelma Cumes" (dc_cumes) are both known aliases of Jonathan Rees:

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...6020800989.html

 

E-mailing the Ward 3 ANC Commissioners? Wow. Just Wow.

 

B. Frank

 

The United States Office of Special Counsel will shortly establish for Mr. Sam Brooks and Ms. Tamela Gordon who we are and they will realize at that time, we have no relationship with this guy Rees but a ghost of Brooks Past.

 

Mr. Brooks has a history of wanting to smear his opponents just as he did when he ran for public office before and lost.

 

All of us were just waiting for him to rear his ugly head again and he did and we went into action.

 

Yesterday, a group of people came together to file with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel a (complaint) against his campaign chair for violating the HATCH ACT after the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia saw the facts and concluded there was a violation and instructed us to file. Ms. Tamela Gordon saw that written opinion from the DC OAG.

 

Brooks to cover up his F-up quickly removed all mention on his website the name and endorsement of his campaign chair who is a curret DC government official but not fast enough for us to be able to freeze the flash point presentation and print it out which is attached to our complaint.

 

The evidence of the HATCH ACT violation is a lot stronger than just that.

 

No sooner than we popped the punk doggess he scrambles to seek peace with his rivals by asking them to sign a pledge which you can find on his website but who is he kidding. A clean campaign? That punk doggess does not know the meaning of a clean campaign.

 

All of you crackers should put on your white sheets and come on out of the dark because nobody is being fooled.

Edited February 9, 2006 by bfrankdc

[truthseeker]

When reading the linked article, please know that "roque20009" and "Thelma Cumes" (dc_cumes) are both known aliases of Jonathan Rees:

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...6020800989.html

 

E-mailing the Ward 3 ANC Commissioners? Wow. Just Wow.

 

B. Frank

 

Not exactly the "cruise missile in the azz" Alias Guy promised (by the way: what's up with the sudden use of outmoded street slang mixed in with the usual Alias Guy-isms? Weird.)

 

Wow, a rules clarification. Earth shattering. And the Woodward and Bernstein line was an absolute gem of grandiosity ! The best part though, was the subtle sarcasm contained in the headline. One imagines that, being no slouches, they're well aware of the "complainant"'s actual identity.

 

Thanks for the link, B.

Edited February 9, 2006 by truthseeker

[godfather]

Golden Girl, how about all the sex realted ads that appear elsewhere with your name on it over in so many places.

 

Anybody can put up a phony ad and make it look like you did it just as you placed some and then come here and lie about it.

 

Try harder and you can get a job at AVIS!

 

 

Sure Rees, you played it real smart...were you thinking the same thing when you did this?

Jonathan Rees' attempt to solicit sex take 1:

 

http://forums.washingtondc.craigslist.org/?ID=25967295

 

Jonathan Rees' attempt to solicit sex take 2:

 

Received: by 10.11.1.23 with SMTP id 23mr161921cwa; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:26:49 -0800 (PST)

Received: from 4.249.111.100 by f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com with HTTP;

Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:26:49 +0000 (UTC)

From: jrrees@peoplepc.com

To: "Discrete affairs in Washington DC area" <Discrete-affairs-in-Washington-DC-area@googlegroups.com>

Subject: ITALIAN MAN 40 ISO WM FOR KINKY SEX

Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:26:49 -0000

Message-ID: <1132975609.493196.246950@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

User-Agent: G2/0.2

X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; PeoplePal 3.0; InfoPath.1; PeoplePal 6.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

 

MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

If you a kinky lady and would like to meet a hot Italian guy then let's

chat.

 

Most of you have seen it before, it's an oldie, but a goodie

 

PS..by your logic should we pursue a Hatch Act violation for Mayor Williams' recent fundraiser for Kathy Patterson?

[bfrankdc]

Not to get into the whole sex ad thing, since people's private lives are their business, but I am not sure how someone could doctor the Yahoo server clocks, since most of the posts are from the Summer and Fall....long before anyone knew who Rees was.

 

Just saying.

 

B. Frank

[factchecker2]

And then there's the cover up: As soon as somebody mentions a specific incriminating message, Rees deletes it. Or tries. He can't delete them all, because it appears that he sometimes forgets the password associated with a particular account. As in: http://profiles.yahoo.com/jrrees_1955

 

And the still unanswered question: Does Rees' so-called wife, Mindy Silverman, know about all these advertisements for sex by Rees? On the one hand, Rees crows about being married to Mindy Silverman, but on the other hand there are many messages posted by Jonathan Rees in which he claims to be single.

 

Where is Mindy? We used to see posts by her, but no more. As Rees' campaign manager, you'd think she'd have something to say about her husband-candidate.

 

Of course, there are many unanswered questions about Jonathan Rees. Where exactly does he work? Where did Rees go to school? Why did Rees send a vulgar email to every judge on the DC Superior Court ( http://mishpat.net/cyberlaw/archive/update15.shtml )? On his website Rees claims to "Rees has over twenty (20) years experience in upper business management and government affairs." Really? Then prove it.

 

And why is Rees now using only aliases to post on DC Pages (and on Craig's List, too.) Why won't Jonathan Rees answer these questions under his own name? (Right: Rees had his records sealed: http://www.dcmessageboards.com/index.php?showtopic=7497 Does anyone believe that?)

 

The bottom line, pardon the cliche, is that Rees simply lies about virtually everything.

 

 

 

Not to get into the whole sex ad thing, since people's private lives are their business, but I am not sure how someone could doctor the Yahoo server clocks, since most of the posts are from the Summer and Fall....long before anyone knew who Rees was.

 

Just saying.

 

B. Frank

[godfather]

Why, because Rees is not posting anything.

 

I gave all of you morons two hints last night as to who we are and you have yet to use your pea brains to even guess.

 

 

 

 

And then there\'s the cover up: As soon as somebody mentions a specific incriminating message, Rees deletes it. Or tries. He can\'t delete them all, because it appears that he sometimes forgets the password associated with a particular account. As in: http://profiles.yahoo.com/jrrees_1955

 

And the still unanswered question: Does Rees\' so-called wife, Mindy Silverman, know about all these advertisements for sex by Rees? On the one hand, Rees crows about being married to Mindy Silverman, but on the other hand there are many messages posted by Jonathan Rees in which he claims to be single.

 

Where is Mindy? We used to see posts by her, but no more. As Rees\' campaign manager, you\'d think she\'d have something to say about her husband-candidate.

 

Of course, there are many unanswered questions about Jonathan Rees. Where exactly does he work? Where did Rees go to school? Why did Rees send a vulgar email to every judge on the DC Superior Court ( http://mishpat.net/cyberlaw/archive/update15.shtml )? On his website Rees claims to \"Rees has over twenty (20) years experience in upper business management and government affairs.\" Really? Then prove it.

 

And why is Rees now using only aliases to post on DC Pages (and on Craig\'s List, too.) Why won\'t Jonathan Rees answer these questions under his own name? (Right: Rees had his records sealed: http://www.dcmessageboards.com/index.php?showtopic=7497 Does anyone believe that?)

 

The bottom line, pardon the cliche, is that Rees simply lies about virtually everything.