truthseeker Posted January 3, 2006 Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 At the hands of the Unnameable One. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissGloverPark Posted January 3, 2006 Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 At the hands of the Unnameable One. < SAM BROOKS and his long list of aliases because he is so jealous that his three rivals have a real thing going and he does not. It is time SAM that you just go away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthseeker Posted January 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 At the hands of the Unnameable One. < SAM BROOKS and his long list of aliases because he is so jealous that his three rivals have a real thing going and he does not. It is time SAM that you just go away. That response is SO 2005, Rees. No one's buying it anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissGloverPark Posted January 3, 2006 Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 That response is SO 2005, SAM BROOKS. No one\'s buying it anymore as you are the only person who has a reason to attack your rivals as they are not attacking you. Get a life because you sure have no campaign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthseeker Posted January 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 That response is SO 2005, SAM BROOKS. No one\'s buying it anymore as you are the only person who has a reason to attack your rivals as they are not attacking you. Get a life because you sure have no campaign. So what you're saying is "I'm rubber, you're glue" etc. Very sophisticated, Rees. That response is SO 2005, SAM BROOKS. No one\'s buying it anymore as you are the only person who has a reason to attack your rivals as they are not attacking you. Get a life because you sure have no campaign. So what you're saying is "I'm rubber, you're glue" etc. Very sophisticated, Rees. PS: Stop calling me "Sam Brooks". It's just plain incorrect, convenient though it may be for you to imagine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissGloverPark Posted January 3, 2006 Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 This is your sickness SAM BROOKS...Anybody who disagrees with you is Rees and that is a poor tatic in attacking someone who is better than you and not a man who got fired from Fenty\'s campaign. Start being yourself and accept the fact that you have nothing going for you that we want to hear until you stop your stupid internet games and get out on the street like the other candidates have and let people see what you don\'t have to offer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthseeker Posted January 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 That response is SO 2005, SAM BROOKS. No one\'s buying it anymore as you are the only person who has a reason to attack your rivals as they are not attacking you. Get a life because you sure have no campaign. And finally, Brooks' rivals AREN'T attacking him. Look at this entire board. It's been reduced to nothing but Rees calling Brooks a "lazy bum" etc. The other posts are merely reactions to it, not attacks. Your slippery use of language rivals that of Karl Rove, dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissGloverPark Posted January 3, 2006 Report Share Posted January 3, 2006 SAM YOU ATTACK ALL YOUR RIVALS HERE ON DC PAGES AND IN OTHER FORUMS BUT ALL UNDER THE SAME 5-6 SCREEN NAMES. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthseeker Posted January 4, 2006 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2006 SAM YOU ATTACK ALL YOUR RIVALS HERE ON DC PAGES AND IN OTHER FORUMS BUT ALL UNDER THE SAME 5-6 SCREEN NAMES. You're as mistaken as you are transparent and amoral, "M'am". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts