Guest Human Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 Getting back to the issue at hand, you still want to shove big brother down people’s throats. Your tactics have changed, but your goal is still the same. You just think that some of us in here are going to buy that all of a sudden that you have seen the light. My God!!! Come on, get real. If your group was still in charge you would still be pushing the same old pabulum. When I agreed with you that "I didn't find anything wrong Net neutrality" that should have raised your antenna. It was an intellectual trap of which simply didn't catch on to. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- How is my stating public servants working together in a open public forum a "defacto Big Brother Internet." I do not see any civil liberties taken away. What you really are trying to say is that you would rather have the few watch the many. Instead of the many watching the few. The People are tired of closed-door meetings or back-room deals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Human Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 Oh! I almost forgot, For years on the net your group has been accusing the republicans of wanting to regulate the internet, but your group is now ON RECORD in wanting to do so. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH. GOT YA! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jim R Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 Getting back to the issue at hand, you still want to shove big brother down people’s throats. Your tactics have changed, but your goal is still the same. You just think that some of us in here are going to buy that all of a sudden that you have seen the light. My God!!! Come on, get real. If your group was still in charge you would still be pushing the same old pabulum. When I agreed with you that "I didn't find anything wrong Net neutrality" that should have raised your antenna. It was an intellectual trap of which simply didn't catch on to. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "want to shove big brother down people’s throats." All I can say is, again, you watch too much Fox News and if you believe Dems just "want to shove big brother down people's throats" it just shows how out of touch you are and how misguided your rhetoric is. Come on now, Human, I'm sure you're a nice person, and you're intelligent, but you sound like you take your talking points straight from from Fox News, which is to say straight from the GOP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jim R Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 "want to shove big brother down people’s throats." All I can say is, again, you watch too much Fox News and if you believe Dems just "want to shove big brother down people's throats" it just shows how out of touch you are and how misguided your rhetoric is. Come on now, Human, I'm sure you're a nice person, and you're intelligent, but you sound like you take your talking points straight from from Fox News, which is to say straight from the GOP. Oh and by the way, "pabulum" is a great word, Human, (I had to look it up) but be careful: when you use big words like that it makes you sound like a liberal-elite-socialist-bleeding-heart-job-killing-hippy. Palin, Boehner, McConnell and the rest of your Republican brethren would definitely not approve, just so you know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Human Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 Jim R, Live with it. Your group is still on record as wanting to regulate the internet. There aint jack that your group "democrats" can do about it either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jim R Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 Human, you misunderstand me: I encourage education and proper use of the English language, I was just noting you run the risk of being branded a "liberal elite commie" when you go out on a limb and appear educated. No worries... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Human Posted January 20, 2011 Report Share Posted January 20, 2011 Understood now! You just got to take into consideration that I am a republican who has been trying to develop a sense of humor. I'm more of the Mad Scientist type of personality. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Human, you misunderstand me: I encourage education and proper use of the English language, I was just noting you run the risk of being branded a "liberal elite commie" when you go out on a limb and appear educated. No worries... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LAW Posted January 21, 2011 Report Share Posted January 21, 2011 In response in you TRYING to deflect the main issue at hand I will respond to you. It is funny that you never brought this up when your group rammed the health care Bill through. You yourself have "as a government employee" tried curb civil liberties in here on the internet by anyone calling you out on the issue by issuing threats of slander. There by curbing the right to free speech. How do you codify these gaps? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MAD HUMAN DRUNK, Why do you keep saying I am a government employee? You know nothing about me. Please do not sidestep the answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Human Posted January 21, 2011 Report Share Posted January 21, 2011 Please note Democrat Civility. Cough! Cough! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAD HUMAN DRUNK, Why do you keep saying I am a government employee? You know nothing about me. Please do not sidestep the answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LAW Posted January 21, 2011 Report Share Posted January 21, 2011 You still have not answered the question. Maybe you are afraid of publicly stating that you are a fraud with way too much time on your hands? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Human Posted January 21, 2011 Report Share Posted January 21, 2011 The Democrats were more than willing to use Gabriel Gifford’s attack to squelch speech. Anyone against the democrats is a fraud. When that failed as it has right now they use another tactic called "Slander". You know what they are trying to do to the internet. Anything that they can use to intimidate others into their point of view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts